Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzden Bektaş Ozel
dc.contributor.authorDidem Eren
dc.contributor.authorGulsah Akın Goktolga
dc.contributor.authorZubeyde Polat Akın
dc.date.accessioned23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T16:34:13Z
dc.date.available23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-23T16:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1302-5805
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TVRjMk1qVTVPUT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/3013
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the cytotoxic effects of four composite resin materials with different content. Material and Methods: Two traditional methacrylate-based (Clearfil AP-X, RefleXions), as well as a self- adhering methacrylate-based (Vertise Flow) and a silorane-based (Filtek Silorane) composite resin were tested in the experiment. Ten cylindrical specimens were made of each material, using a mould (2mm. thick and 8 mm. in diameter). An agar diffusion method was employed, and cytotoxicity rankings were determined using lysis index scores. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used. Results: Amongst the composite resins, the silorane-based composite was found to be less cytotoxic than the methacrylate-based composite resins, which all had the same cytotoxicity ranking. Conclusions: The silorane-based composite resin was considered more biocompatible than the methacrylate- based composite resins.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the cytotoxic effects of four composite resin materials with different content. Material and Methods: Two traditional methacrylate-based (Clearfil AP-X, RefleXions), as well as a self- adhering methacrylate-based (Vertise Flow) and a silorane-based (Filtek Silorane) composite resin were tested in the experiment. Ten cylindrical specimens were made of each material, using a mould (2mm. thick and 8 mm. in diameter). An agar diffusion method was employed, and cytotoxicity rankings were determined using lysis index scores. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used. Results: Amongst the composite resins, the silorane-based composite was found to be less cytotoxic than the methacrylate-based composite resins, which all had the same cytotoxicity ranking. Conclusions: The silorane-based composite resin was considered more biocompatible than the methacrylate- based composite resins.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliğien_US
dc.titleCytotoxicity evaluation of methacrylate- and silorane-based composite resinsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage334en_US
dc.identifier.startpage327en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record