dc.contributor.author | Ozden Bektaş Ozel | |
dc.contributor.author | Didem Eren | |
dc.contributor.author | Gulsah Akın Goktolga | |
dc.contributor.author | Zubeyde Polat Akın | |
dc.date.accessioned | 23.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-23T16:34:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 23.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-23T16:34:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1302-5805 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TVRjMk1qVTVPUT09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/3013 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the cytotoxic effects of four composite resin materials with different content. Material and Methods: Two traditional methacrylate-based (Clearfil AP-X, RefleXions), as well as a self- adhering methacrylate-based (Vertise Flow) and a silorane-based (Filtek Silorane) composite resin were tested in the experiment. Ten cylindrical specimens were made of each material, using a mould (2mm. thick and 8 mm. in diameter). An agar diffusion method was employed, and cytotoxicity rankings were determined using lysis index scores. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used. Results: Amongst the composite resins, the silorane-based composite was found to be less cytotoxic than the methacrylate-based composite resins, which all had the same cytotoxicity ranking. Conclusions: The silorane-based composite resin was considered more biocompatible than the methacrylate- based composite resins. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the cytotoxic effects of four composite resin materials with different content. Material and Methods: Two traditional methacrylate-based (Clearfil AP-X, RefleXions), as well as a self- adhering methacrylate-based (Vertise Flow) and a silorane-based (Filtek Silorane) composite resin were tested in the experiment. Ten cylindrical specimens were made of each material, using a mould (2mm. thick and 8 mm. in diameter). An agar diffusion method was employed, and cytotoxicity rankings were determined using lysis index scores. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used. Results: Amongst the composite resins, the silorane-based composite was found to be less cytotoxic than the methacrylate-based composite resins, which all had the same cytotoxicity ranking. Conclusions: The silorane-based composite resin was considered more biocompatible than the methacrylate- based composite resins. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Diş Hekimliği | en_US |
dc.title | Cytotoxicity evaluation of methacrylate- and silorane-based composite resins | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 334 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 327 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US] |