Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCengiz, Tuba
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:37:01Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:37:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1059-910X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0029
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23250
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/5867
dc.descriptionWOS: 000471903000009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30866096en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of two different self-adhesive composites (SACs) on the permanent dentin by applying five different universal adhesive systems. In this study, two different SACs [Vertise Flow (VF), Fusio Liquid Dentin (FLD)] and five different bonding systems [Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUB), Single Bond Universal (SBU), All Bond Universal (ABU), Prime Bond Universal (PBU), Futurabond U (FBU)] were used. A total of 22 groups were created in which SACs were applied without adhesive and with five different universal bonding agents in total-etch (TE) and self-etch (SE) modes. Two hundred and forty test sticks were obtained using 48 healthy human molar teeth in total with groups having 10 samples each. The mu TBS test was applied to each sample in the Universal test device and the data obtained were analyzed statistically by variance analysis and Tukey HSD test. In addition, the resin-dentin interface and fractures modes in the groups were examined by SEM. Upon examining the mu TBS results, the highest values were seen in the use of SBU adhesive in TE mode in VF group, while the lowest values were seen in the FLD control group. The difference between the control and experimental groups was found statistically significant (p < .05). Upon comparing the control groups with each other, it was seen that VF group had higher mu TBS values than FLD group and the difference between the groups was found statistically significant (p < .05). The mu TBS results and SEM images of the study showed that the use of SACs with universal adhesive systems provides a more effective bond strength.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCumhuriyet University [DIS-200]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCumhuriyet University, Grant/Award Number: DIS-200en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/jemt.23250en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectself-adhesive compositesen_US
dc.subjectuniversal adhesive systemsen_US
dc.subjectmicro-tensile bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectSEMen_US
dc.titleComparison of microtensile bond strength and resin-dentin interfaces of two self-adhesive flowable composite resins by using different universal adhesives: Scanning electron microscope studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUEen_US
dc.contributor.department[Cengiz, Tuba -- Unal, Murat] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Pediat Dent, Fac Dent, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDunal, murat -- 0000-0002-5909-0202en_US
dc.identifier.volume82en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1040en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1032en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record