dc.contributor.author | Kirmali, Omer | |
dc.contributor.author | Kapdan, Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Harorli, Osman Tolga | |
dc.contributor.author | Barutcugil, Cagatay | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozarslan, Mehmet Mustafa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-28T09:56:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-28T09:56:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0001-6357 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-3850 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.946963 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8071 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000346333700005 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 25373516 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin in five different repair systems. Materials and methods. Sixty specimens (7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of zirconia ceramic were fabricated. All specimen surfaces were prepared with a 30 mm fine diamond rotary cutting instrument with water irrigation for 10 s and dried with oil-free air. Specimens were then randomly divided into six groups for the following different intra-oral repair systems (n = 10): Group 1, control group; Group 2, Cojet system (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); Group 3, Cimara (R) System (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); Group 4, Z-Prime Plus System (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL); Group 5, Clearfil (TM) System (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); and Group 6, Z-Bond System (Danville, CA). After surface conditioning, a composite resin Grandio (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) was applied to the zirconia surface using a cylindrical mold (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in length) and incrementally filled up, according to the manufacturer's instructions of each intra-oral system. Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the bond strength values. Results. There were significant differences between Groups 2-6 and Group 1. The highest bond strength values were obtained with Group 2 (17.26 +/- 3.22) and Group 3 (17.31 +/- 3.62), while the lowest values were observed with Group 1 (8.96 +/- 1.62) and Group 6 (12.85 +/- 3.95). Conclusion. All repair systems tested increased the bond strength values between zirconia and composite resin that used surface grinding with a diamond bur. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3109/00016357.2014.946963 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | zirconia | en_US |
dc.subject | repair | en_US |
dc.subject | composite resin | en_US |
dc.subject | sear bond strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Y-TZP | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | [Kirmali, Omer -- Ozarslan, Mehmet Mustafa] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey -- [Kapdan, Alper] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- [Harorli, Osman Tolga -- Barutcugil, Cagatay] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Antalya, Turkey | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | Kirmali, Omer -- 0000-0002-4313-344X; Ozarslan, Mehmet Mustafa -- 0000-0001-7909-3112; Barutcugil, Cagatay -- 0000-0002-5321-2299; harorli, osman tolga -- 0000-0001-6828-5063 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 73 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 32 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 28 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |