Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEren, Digdem
dc.contributor.authorBektas, Ozden Ozel
dc.contributor.authorSiso, Seyda Herguner
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:59:52Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:59:52Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.741696
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8713
dc.descriptionWOS: 000322832200087en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23347074en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the microtensile, microshear and shear bond strength test methods to assess the bond strength of two self-etch adhesives and one etch&rinse adhesive on dentin. Materials and methods: Seventy-five extracted human molars were ground to expose their flat dentin surfaces and randomly assigned to one of three groups according to the type of test method (15 for microtensile, 15 for microshear, 45 for shear). Each of these groups was then assigned to three sub-groups according to the bonding systems (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray; G Bond, GC; Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply) used. Then, 15 specimens were prepared for each sub-group according to the test method employed (n = 15). After being stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the specimens were placed in a universal testing machine for three test methods and stressed at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Mean bond strengths were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results. The microtensile test had the highest bond strength (p = 0.046). Clearfil SE Bond and Prime& Bond NT produced significantly higher values than the G Bond in the microtensile bond test (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found among the adhesives in the microshear bond test (p > 0.05). For the shear test, Clearfil SE Bond showed higher bond strength than Prime&Bond NT and G Bond (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Bond strength to dentin depends on the material and the test method used.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3109/00016357.2012.741696en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectadhesive systemsen_US
dc.subjectmicrotensile bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectmicroshear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectshear bond strengthen_US
dc.titleThree different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.contributor.department[Eren, Digdem -- Bektas, Ozden Ozel] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- [Siso, Seyda Herguner] Bezmialem Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume71en_US
dc.identifier.issue03.Apren_US
dc.identifier.endpage983en_US
dc.identifier.startpage978en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record