Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBasel, Halil
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Uenal
dc.contributor.authorKutlu, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Sadiye Deniz
dc.contributor.authorDostbil, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorTasdemir, Muege
dc.contributor.authorKatrancioglu, Nurkay
dc.contributor.authorHazar, Abdulsamed
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:14:04Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:14:04Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1301-5680
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10052
dc.descriptionWOS: 000272501600004en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) procedures in the surgical treatment of aortoiliac occlusive diseases (AIOD) were compared advantages and disadvantages of these procedures were evaluated. Methods: Fifty-five patients who underwent surgery for AIOD between October 2003 and August 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. Retroperitoneal technique was performed in 30 patients and TP technique was performed in 25 patients. Clinical features, risk factors, peri- and postoperative medical data were analyzed and compared between two groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in clinical features and risk factors. Of the eight operative parameters, five were in favor of RP procedure. Duration of intensive care unit stay (p<0.01), duration of hospital stay (p<0.01), return of bowel functions (p<0.01), beginning time of oral feeding (p<0.01), effort pain score (p<0.01) were significantly better than those observed in TP group. Pulmonary complications were also fewer in RP group (p=0.02) but the difference was not statistically significant for this parameter. There were no statistically significant differences when the other complication parameters [wound complications (p=0.09), paralitic ileus (p=0.14), re-operation (p=0.46), 30(th) day mortality (p=0.30)] were considered. Conclusion: When the results are compared, it is seen that RP procedure is more advantageous than TP procedure in the surgical treatment of AIOD.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherBAYCINAR MEDICAL PUBL-BAYCINAR TIBBI YAYINCILIKen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAortic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectcomparisionen_US
dc.subjectretroperitoneal approachen_US
dc.subjecttransperitoneal approachen_US
dc.titleComparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal procedures in aortoiliac occlusive diseasesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Basel, Halil -- Aydin, Uenal -- Kutlu, Hakan -- Ozsoy, Sadiye Deniz -- Tasdemir, Muege] Van Yuksek Ihtisas Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Kalp & Damar Cerrahisi Klin, TR-65100 Van, Turkey -- [Dostbil, Aysenur] Van Yuksek Ihtisas Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Anestezi & Reanimasyon Klin, TR-65100 Van, Turkey -- [Hazar, Abdulsamed] Harran Univ, Tip Fak, Kalp & Damar Cerrahisi Anabilim Dali, Sanliurfa, Turkey -- [Katrancioglu, Nurkay] Cumhuriyet Univ, Tip Fak, Kalp & Damar Cerrahisi Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.startpage249en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record