Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Isik
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:14:14Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0098-3004
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10116
dc.descriptionWOS: 000266544700007en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to compare the landslide susceptibility mapping methods of frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression and artificial neural networks (ANN) applied in the Kat County (Tokat-Turkey). Digital elevation model (DEM) was first constructed using GIS software. Landslide-related factors such as geology, faults, drainage system, topographical elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI) and stream power index (SPI) were used in the landslide susceptibility analyses. Landslide susceptibility maps were produced from the frequency ratio, logistic regression and neural networks models, and they were then compared by means of their validations. The higher accuracies of the susceptibility maps for all three models were obtained from the comparison of the landslide susceptibility maps with the known landslide locations. However, respective area under curve (AUC) values of 0.826, 0.842 and 0.852 for frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural networks showed that the map obtained from ANN model is more accurate than the other models, accuracies of all models can be evaluated relatively similar. The results obtained in this study also showed that the frequency ratio model can be used as a simple tool in assessment of landslide susceptibility when a sufficient number of data were obtained. Input process, calculations and output process are very simple and can be readily understood in the frequency ratio model, however logistic regression and neural networks require the conversion of data to ASCII or other formats. Moreover, it is also very hard to process the large amount of data in the statistical package. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLandslideen_US
dc.subjectSusceptibility mapen_US
dc.subjectGISen_US
dc.subjectFrequency ratioen_US
dc.subjectLogistic regressionen_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural networksen_US
dc.subjectKat (Tokat-Turkey)en_US
dc.titleLandslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCOMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCESen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Geol Engn, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1138en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1125en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record