Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKilic, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorOzec, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorYeler, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorAyas, Buelent
dc.contributor.authorGumus, Cesur
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:14:54Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:14:54Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.362
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10293
dc.descriptionWOS: 000260606700006en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 18940485en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of local and systemic simvastatin application on distraction osteogenesis. Materials and Methods: Eighteen New Zealand white rabbits underwent unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. After 7 days of neutral fixation, 0.4 mm twice per day, distraction was performed for 10 days. Simvastatin was applied locally during the osteotomy phase with a gelatin sponge carrier and systemically during the distraction osteogenesis period by oral gavage. All animals were killed at the end of the consolidation period of 14 days. The distracted mandibles were harvested and evaluated by plain radiography, by peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and with histomorphometry. Results: Radiographic evaluation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography showed that the area of the regenerate increased by 9.6% in the local simvastatin group and by 19.3% in the systemic simvastatin group as compared with the control group. In both experimental groups the density of the regenerate increased by 6.7% as compared with the control group. Statistical evaluation of radiographic data showed that all of these changes were not significant. Histomorphometric evaluation determined that there was no statistical difference among groups with regard to the ratios of bone tissue volume to fibrous tissue volume and bone tissue volume to marrow tissue volume. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that simvastatin's effect on enhancing distraction regenerate is limited with the applied doses and methods. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeonsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.362en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEffects of Simvastatin on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Kilic, Erdem -- Ozec, Ilker -- Yeler, Hasan] Erciyes Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kayseri, Turkey -- [Korkmaz, Adnan -- Ayas, Buelent] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Histol & Embryol, Samsun, Turkey -- [Gumus, Cesur] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2238en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2233en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record