Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSilici, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorVardar-Unlu, Gulhan
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:15:57Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0959-3993
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9430-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10499
dc.descriptionWOS: 000249921900018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27517836en_US
dc.description.abstractHoneybees collect propolis from practically any abundant plant source in the neighborhood of the hive, be it populus, eucalyptus, pine, sugarcane, cashew nut or orange trees. We have described that the origin plants of Turkish propolis are Populus sp., Eucalyptus sp. and Castanea sativa. In our previous study, propolis samples from Middle Anatolia displayed the typical pattern of "poplar" propolis: they contained pinobanksin, caffeic and ferulic acids and their esters. The propolis samples examined in this study were shown not to contain polar phenolics. The main components of Eucalyptus propolis were aromatic acids, mainly cinnamic acid and its esters, that are usually found in Eucalyptus species resins. The second distinct sample originated from West Anatolia. Although it contained low amounts of phenolic substances and aromatic acids, its main components were sugars and glycosides. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between propolis samples in antibacterial activity, however the yeasts were shown to be more sensitive to eucalyptus-propolis. Gram negative bacteria were susceptible to none of the samples tested.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11274-007-9430-7en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectpropolisen_US
dc.subjectEucalyptus spen_US
dc.subjectEucalyptus type propolisen_US
dc.subjectCastanea sativaen_US
dc.subjectCastanea type propolisen_US
dc.subjectantimicrobial activityen_US
dc.titleAntibacterial activity and phytochemical evidence for the plant origin of Turkish propolis from different regionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalWORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentErciyes Univ, Dept Anim Sci, S Cikrikcioglu Vocat Coll, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Microbiol, Fac Med, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1803en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1797en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record