dc.contributor.author | Siso, S. H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hurmuzlu, F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Turgut, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Altundasar, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Serper, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Er, K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-28T10:16:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-28T10:16:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0143-2885 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2591 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01192.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10648 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000244229100001 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 17305692 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aim To compare the cusp fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resins and two post systems. Methodology Eighty extracted single-rooted human maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to eight groups (n = 10). Group 1 (control) did not receive any preparation. From groups 2 to 8, the teeth were root filled and mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. Group 2 remained unrestored. Group 3 was restored with packable resin composite using a single-step adhesive. Group 4 was restored with packable resin composite using a single-step adhesive and a thin layer of flowable resin composite. Group 5 was restored with packable resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. Group 6 was restored with ormocer resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. Group 7 was restored with an endodontic glass fibre post and hybrid resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. Group 8 was restored with an endodontic zirconium post and hybrid resin composite using a total-etch two-step adhesive. The teeth were then mounted in a universal testing machine, the buccal cusp loaded (30 degrees) until fracture, and the data analysed statistically. Results Group 1 had the greatest fracture resistance, and group 2 the poorest. Groups 5-8 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) fracture resistance than groups 3 and 4. No significant differences were found between groups 3 and 4, or amongst groups 5-8 (P > 0.05). Conclusions For root filled maxillary premolars with MOD cavities, adhesive resin composite restorations, with and without glass and zirconium posts, increased the fracture resistance of the buccal cuSPS. A total-etch two-step adhesive increased significantly fracture resistance more than a one-step adhesive. For the one-step adhesive, an additional layer of flowable resin composite did not enhance fracture resistance. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | WILEY | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01192.x | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | cusp fracture resistance | en_US |
dc.subject | endodontically restored premolars | en_US |
dc.title | Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Sch Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Prosthet Dent, Sch Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Hacettepe Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Ankara, Turkey -- Karadeniz Tech Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Trabzon, Turkey | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | Er, Kursat -- 0000-0002-0667-4909 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 40 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 168 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 161 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |