Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDevelioglu, H
dc.contributor.authorSaraydin, SU
dc.contributor.authorBolayir, G
dc.contributor.authorDupoirieux, L
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:18:20Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:18:20Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn1549-3296
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30692
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10833
dc.description35th National Meeting of the Turkish-Society-of-Periodontology -- MAY, 2005 -- Istanbul, TURKEYen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000237431300022en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 16514598en_US
dc.description.abstractCalcium phosphate ceramics are being extensively used for orthopedic, periodontal, and dental applications. This Study aimed to assess the effect of a biphasic ceramic such as Ceraform (R) on the osteogenesis in a rat calvarial defect model. 20 Wistar rats were enrolled in the study. Two symmetrical, circular, and 5-mm-wide full thickness defects were created in the parietal bones of each animal. The left defect was left empty as a control and the right defect was filled with the particular implant material. Animals were divided into two groups, and 10 animals were sacrificed at month 3 and the rest were sacrificed at month 6. The calvarial specimens were harvested for histological examinations. Defect area samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson Thrichrom. A semiquantitative method was used to quantify the bone regeneration. The defects were mostly filled with fibrous connective tissue (3-6 months) in the control site. A loose, fibrovascular tissue was observed at the side of ceraform implantation at month 3. By 6 month, a dense collagenous tissue was observed at the same area. Multinuclear giant cells (MNGC) were detected around the implant bed at month '3 and month 6. No necrosis, tumorigenesis, or infection was observed at the implantation site at any time. There was no statistically meaningful difference regarding bone regeneration between the two defects at each observation period (p > 0.05). This Study showed that Ceraform (R) is biocompatible. However, this study indicates that biphasic ceramic do not offer any advantage over hydroxyapatite ceramics. It was also revealed that it had no effects on bone regeneration and that it seemed to be a space maintainer. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Soc Periodontolen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEY-LISSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/jbm.a.30692en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbiphasic ceramicen_US
dc.subjectbone regenerationen_US
dc.subjectraten_US
dc.titleAssessment of the effect of a biphasic ceramic on bone response in a rat calvarial defect modelen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART Aen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Dishekimligi Fak, Dept Periodontol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Histol & Embryol, Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Diagnosis & Radiol, Sivas, Turkey -- Polyclin Marmandais, Laurent Dupoirieux, Marmande, Franceen_US
dc.identifier.volume77Aen_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.endpage631en_US
dc.identifier.startpage627en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record