Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyan, S
dc.contributor.authorKaya, K
dc.contributor.authorTopsakal, K
dc.contributor.authorKilicarslan, H
dc.contributor.authorGokce, G
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, Y
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:22:04Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:22:04Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096
dc.identifier.issn1464-410X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05641.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10975
dc.descriptionWOS: 000230726000037en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 16042740en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE To assess the effect of antimuscarinic treatment with tolterodine combined with behavioural modification as a first-line treatment, before invasive investigation, in children with non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction but no obvious anatomical or neurogenic cause. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study comprised 44 children presenting with voiding dysfunction (30 girls and 14 boys, mean age 7 years, range 5-14); all had a noninvasive evaluation consisting of a history, urine analysis, renal and bladder ultrasonography and physical examination, with specific emphasis on the voiding pattern. Anticholinergic treatment with tolterodine (1 mg twice daily) was started in all patients; they were also informed about conservative management, including timed voiding, double voiding and relaxation of the pelvic floor during voiding. At the start and after 3 months, the dysfunctional voiding symptom score (DVSS) was completed twice by all patients. RESULTS For all patients the mean (sd) DVSS was 14.0 (2.67) and 6.68 (3.67) before and after treatment, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean scores for girls and boys, respectively, were 13.8 (2.79) and 14.5 (2.44) before and 6.43 (3.79) and 7.50 (3.34) after treatment. CONCLUSION Tolterodine combined with behavioural modification for dysfunctional voiding in children with no neurological or anatomical abnormality can be recommended as a first-line treatment before invasive evaluation. Additionally, the DVSS appears to provide accurate and objective data for monitoring the effect of treatment in such children.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05641.xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectvoiding dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjecttolterodineen_US
dc.subjectdysfunctional voiding symptom scoreen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of tolterodine as a first-line treatment for non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction in childrenen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalBJU INTERNATIONALen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume96en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.endpage+en_US
dc.identifier.startpage411en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record