Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGedik, R
dc.contributor.authorHurmuzlu, F
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, A
dc.contributor.authorBektas, OO
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, AK
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:22:04Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:22:04Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn0002-8177
dc.identifier.issn1943-4723
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0314
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10978
dc.descriptionWOS: 000231320400013en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 16161365en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Rough, poorly polished resin-based composite (RBC) surfaces contribute to staining, plaque accumulation, gingival irritation and recurrent caries. Proper finishing and polishing enhance both the esthetics and the longevity of restored teeth. Methods. The authors evaluated the influence of various finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of four microhybrid RBCs. Thirty samples of each material were cured under Mylar matrix strips (Yates and Bird/Motloid, Chicago). All microhybrid RBC specimens were finished with multifluted carbide burs, except for the Mylar matrix strip samples, and then were polished using one of four finishing systems: Sof-Lex contouring and polishing disks (3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.); Enhance Finishing System (Dentsply-Caulk, Milford, Del.) followed by Prisma Gloss (Dentsply-Caulk) polishing paste application; Astropol finishing, polishing and high-gloss polishing system (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein); and Astrobrush polishing system (Ivoclar I Vivadent). The authors tested the samples to obtain average surface roughness and analyzed the values. Results. The use of the Astrobrush technique caused the greatest roughness on all RBC specimens. The smoothest surface was produced with a carbide bur followed by aluminum oxide disks, Astropol technique and Enhance technique. Overall, there were differences in surface quality among the materials. InTen-S (Ivoclar Vivadent) had statistically lower surface roughness values after finishing and polishing with the Astrobrush technique, compared with the other RBCs. Conclusion. The highest surface roughness values were achieved after the Astrobrush technique was used. The Sof-Lex aluminum oxide disks, and Enhance and Astropol techniques provided the smoothest surface. Clinical Implications. The Sof-Lex, Enhance and Astropol techniques produced a smooth surface after the finishing and polishing of materials, while the Astrobrush technique yielded the least favorable results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAMER DENTAL ASSOCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0314en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectmicrohybrid resin-based compositeen_US
dc.subjectsurface roughnessen_US
dc.subjectfinishingen_US
dc.subjectpolishingen_US
dc.titleSurface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based compositesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATIONen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Diag & Radiol, Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume136en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1112en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1106en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record