Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKocaturk, S
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, A
dc.contributor.authorDemiray, T
dc.contributor.authorBahar, G
dc.contributor.authorBakici, MZ
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:22:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:22:17Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn0196-0709
dc.identifier.issn1532-818X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.07.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/11067
dc.descriptionWOS: 000226557300010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 15635582en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study is to compare transient bacteriemia ratios between cold dissection tonsillectomy and bipolar cauterizing tonsillectomy, and also to analyze the bacteria detected with superficial/central tonsillar cultures. Methods: A total of 86 patients that were grouped as 46 patients of cold dissection tonsillectomy and 40 patients of bipolar cauterizing tonsillectomy were included in this study. Preoperative surface swab cultures, intraoperative central swab cultures of tonsils, and preoperative and postoperative blood culture samples were obtained. Antibiotic sensitivity tests were determined. Fischer exact 2 test was performed to compare the results of postoperative bacteriemia of both techniques statistically. Results: Postoperative bacteriemia was detected in 6 (13%) patients of cold dissection tonsillectomy group. In 5 (83.3%) of the 6 postoperative bacteriemia patients of cold dissection tonsillectomy group, isolated microorganism was confirmed both in the blood cultures and in the central swab cultures of tonsils, and resistance to penicillin was established. No patient of bipolar cauterizing tonsillectomy group appeared with postoperative bacteriemia. There was a statistically significant difference (P = .028) for postoperative bacteriemia between cold dissection tonsillectomy group and bipolar cauterizing tonsillectomy group. Conclusion: We recommend bipolar cauterizing tonsillectomy for high-risk patients. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.07.003en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleCold dissection versus bipolar cauterizing tonsillectomy for bacteriemiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Med Fac Otorhinolaryngol, Dept Head & Neck Surg, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Social Secur Org, Ankara Educ Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, TR-06110 Ankara, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Clin Microbiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage53en_US
dc.identifier.startpage51en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record