Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoruk, C
dc.contributor.authorBicakci, AA
dc.contributor.authorBascifti, FA
dc.contributor.authorAgar, U
dc.contributor.authorBabacan, H
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:22:50Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:22:50Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/11231
dc.descriptionWOS: 000220792600011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 15132444en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the sagittal, transverse, and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and fan-type RME on dentofacial structures. The study group consisted of 34 patients, 14 boys and 20 girls (average age 12.5 years), selected without considering their skeletal class and sex. The fan-type RME group comprised 17 subjects, who had an anterior constricted maxilla with a normal intermolar width. The RME group comprised 17 other subjects, who had a maxillary transverse discrepancy with a posterior crossbite. The records obtained for each patient included a lateral and a frontal cephalometric film, upper plaster models, and occlusal radiograph obtained before treatment (T1), after expansion (T2), and immediately after a three-month retention period (T3). The data obtained from the evaluation of the records before and after treatment, after treatment and after retention, and before treatment and after retention were compared using paired t-test. Further comparisons between the groups were made using Student's t-test. There was significantly greater expansion in the intercanine than in the intermolar width in the fan-type RME group as compared with the RME group. Downward and forward movement of the maxilla was observed in both groups. The upper incisors were tipped palatally in the RME group, but they were tipped labially in the fan-type RME group. There was significantly greater expansion in the nasal cavity and maxillary width in the RME group as opposed to the fan-type RME group.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherE H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectrapid maxillary expansionen_US
dc.subjectfan-type rapid maxillary expansionen_US
dc.subjectbonded RME appliancesen_US
dc.subjectintercanine and intermolar width changeen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and fan-type rapid maxillary expansion on dentofacial structuresen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalANGLE ORTHODONTISTen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Selcuk Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Konya, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage194en_US
dc.identifier.startpage184en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record