Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHurmuzlu, F
dc.contributor.authorSerper, A
dc.contributor.authorSiso, SH
dc.contributor.authorEr, K
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:23:14Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:23:14Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00738.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/11324
dc.descriptionWOS: 000186119400008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 14641441en_US
dc.description.abstractAim To compare the fracture resistance of root-filled premolar teeth restored with new-generation dentine bonding adhesives. Methodology Sixty extracted single-rooted human maxillary premolar teeth were used. Access cavities were prepared, and the roots were instrumented with K-files to an apical size 50 using a step-back technique. Root fillings were accomplished using gutta percha (Sure-Endo, Seoul, Korea) and AH Plus root canal sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) using the lateral condensation technique. The teeth were then randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth each. A mesiodistocclusal (MOD) cavity was prepared in the teeth to the level of the canal orifices so that the thickness of the buccal wall of the teeth measured 2 mm at the occlusal surface and 3 mm at the cemento-enamel junction. Preparations were restored using the following adhesive systems: Etch & Prime 3.0 (Degussa AG, Hanau, Germany), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan), Prompt L-Pop (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany), Panavia F (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan), Optibond Plus (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) and Admira Bond (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); all preparations except those of the Panavia F and Admira Bond groups were further restored with resin composites. The Panavia F group was restored with amalgam and the Admira Bond group with Ormocer (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany). The teeth were mounted in a Universal Testing Machine (Hounsfield, Surrey, UK), and the buccal walls were subjected to a slowly increasing compressive force until fracture occurred. The force of fracture of the walls of each tooth was recorded and the results in the various groups were compared. Statistical analysis of the data was accomplished using one-way ANOVA. Results There was no significant difference in the fracture resistance of any of the test groups. Conclusions In this laboratory study, the type of dentine bonding agents had no influence in the fracture resistance of teeth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00738.xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdentine bondingen_US
dc.subjectfracture resistanceen_US
dc.subjectroot-filled teethen_US
dc.titleIn vitro fracture resistance of root-filled teeth using new-generation dentine bonding adhesivesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNALen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Sivas, Turkey -- Hacettepe Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDEr, Kursat -- 0000-0002-0667-4909en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.endpage773en_US
dc.identifier.startpage770en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record