Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKilicarslan, H
dc.contributor.authorGokce, G
dc.contributor.authorAyan, S
dc.contributor.authorGuvenal, T
dc.contributor.authorKaya, K
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, EY
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:23:14Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:23:14Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1085-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/11326
dc.descriptionWOS: 000187826500018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 14618312en_US
dc.description.abstractPubovaginal sling procedures are being performed with increased frequency for stress urinary incontinence. The vaginal wall sling was introduced in 1989 by Raz et al., and its success rate has been reported as being 61%-100%. A number of recent studies have identified that some patient factors may influence the likelihood of a successful outcome. In the present study, we evaluated whether preoperative Valsalva leak-point pressure and urethral pressure profile can be used as predictors of success after surgery. We identified the preoperative characteristics of 58 women who underwent an isolated in situ anterior vaginal wall sling procedure by the same surgeon. Patients' ages, previous anti-incontinence procedures, hormone replacement status and previous hysterectomies were determined and patients underwent urodynamics, including cystometry, measurement. of the Valsalva leak-point pressure and urethral pressure profile (maximal urethral pressure). After the vaginal wall sling procedure, success was defined as a significant improvement in stress urinary incontinence symptoms or no symptoms at all. The 58 women ranged from 41 to -71 years old (average 52.3) and average follow-up was 26 months (range 16-34). An anti-incontinence procedure had been done previously in 15% of cases. The success rate was 65.4% in patients with Valsalva leak-point pressure < 50 cmH(2)O and maximal urethral pressure < 30 cmH(2)O, but it was 90.6% in patients with Valsalva leak-point pressure 50 cmH(2)O or higher and maximal urethral pressure 30 cmH(2)O or more. Patients with Valsalva leak-point pressure 50 cmH(2)O or higher and maximal urethral pressure 30 cmH(2)O or more had a 90.6% success rate, and it was significantly higher than the success rate of patients with lower values for both parameters. We concluded that preoperative Valsalva leak-point pressure and maximal urethral pressure can be used to estimate the success rate of anterior vaginal wall sling procedures. When of these parameters are concurrently high, the outcome of surgery seems more favorable.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00192-003-1085-9en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectvaginal wall slingen_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.subjectoutcomeen_US
dc.subjectsuccessen_US
dc.titlePredictors of outcome after in situ anterior vaginal wall sling surgeryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTIONen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.endpage341en_US
dc.identifier.startpage339en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record