Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlagozlu, H
dc.contributor.authorBakici, Z
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, F
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, B
dc.contributor.authorSezer, H
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:24:24Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.issn1056-8727
dc.identifier.issn1873-460X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00166-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/11543
dc.descriptionWOS: 000174772500007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 12039401en_US
dc.description.abstractAnticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies may play a role in the enhancement of platelet aggregation and/or progression of the macrovascular diabetic complications. Also, aCL antibodies may cause or promote ischemia and thrombosis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate IgG aCL and IgM aCL antibodies positivity in type 2 diabetic patients with and without ischemic diabetic foot. In this case-control study, we examined 40 diabetic patients without diabetic foot problem and 35 diabetic patients with ischemic diabetic foot. Forty diabetic patients (19 females, 21 males) without diabetic foot served as Group 1 and 35 diabetic patients (17 females, 18 males) who had ischemic diabetic foot served as Group 2. In the control group, 3 5 nondiabetic healthy subjects (18 females, 17 males) were included in Group 3. The groups were similar in age and sex, which is not statistically significant (P>.05). There was no difference in the IgG aCL antibodies positivity between Groups 1 and 3 (P>.05). However, IgG aCL antibodies positivity in Group 2 was significantly higher than those of the other groups (P<.05). IgG aCL antibodies were found positive in 10% (4/40) of Group 1, 34.3% (12/35) of Group 2 and 8.6% (3/35) of Group 3. When Groups 1 and 2 were compared, the odds ratio adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, coronary artery disease history, cigarette smoking, duration of diabetes mellitus, cholesterol, and haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA1c) was 6.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-32.66; P=.016] for aCL positivity. In conclusion. although available evidence does not prove a causal association between positivity of aCL and diabetic foot, we believe that a causal association is supported by the data obtained from this study. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00166-0en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdiabetic footen_US
dc.subjectanticardiolipin antibodyen_US
dc.titleAnticardiolipin antibody positivity in diabetic patients with and without diabetic footen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Div Internal Med, Dept Emergency Med, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Biostat, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage175en_US
dc.identifier.startpage172en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record