Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGökhan Gökçe
dc.contributor.authorHakan Kılıçarslan
dc.contributor.authorSemih Ayan
dc.contributor.authorS. Siyami Hocaoğlu
dc.contributor.authorE. Yener Gültekin
dc.date.accessioned23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T16:20:13Z
dc.date.available23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-23T16:20:13Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.issn1300-6738
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TVRNd01qVTE=
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/1169
dc.description.abstractWe treated 19 patients with iatrogenic ureteral injuries during a 10-year period. Gynecological operations were the most common surgical procedures (52.6%). The diagnosis of ureteral injury was made immediately in 6 patients and was delayed 14 to 180 days in 13. Five of the 6 injuries recognized during the operation were repaired successfully at the time of injury; one patient resulted a nephrectomy. Seven of the lately recognized 13 patients were treated with percutaneous nephrostomy and the first treatment. The two patients were made ureteroneocystostomy, one was made ureteroureterostomy and one had ureterolysis in the other five patients. We observed ureteral stenosis in the three patients after the operation follow ups. The treatment was achieved with the endourological approach at these patients. Finally, we recommend percutaneous nephrostomy as a first treatment choice in the lately recognized iatrogenic ureteral injuries, while the immediate diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic ureteral injuries, are severely important.en_US
dc.description.abstractWe treated 19 patients with iatrogenic ureteral injuries during a 10-year period. Gynecological operations were the most common surgical procedures (52.6%). The diagnosis of ureteral injury was made immediately in 6 patients and was delayed 14 to 180 days in 13. Five of the 6 injuries recognized during the operation were repaired successfully at the time of injury; one patient resulted a nephrectomy. Seven of the lately recognized 13 patients were treated with percutaneous nephrostomy and the first treatment. The two patients were made ureteroneocystostomy, one was made ureteroureterostomy and one had ureterolysis in the other five patients. We observed ureteral stenosis in the three patients after the operation follow ups. The treatment was achieved with the endourological approach at these patients. Finally, we recommend percutaneous nephrostomy as a first treatment choice in the lately recognized iatrogenic ureteral injuries, while the immediate diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic ureteral injuries, are severely important.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKonu Ataması Yapılmamışen_US
dc.titleİatrojenik üreteral travmalarda tedavi planlarımız ve sonuçlarıen_US
dc.title.alternativeTreatment plans and results in iatrogenic ureteral injuriesen_US
dc.typeotheren_US
dc.relation.journalUlusal Travma Dergisien_US
dc.contributor.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage274en_US
dc.identifier.startpage271en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record