Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkyuz, G
dc.contributor.authorDogan, O
dc.contributor.authorSar, V
dc.contributor.authorYargic, LI
dc.contributor.authorTutkun, H
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:25:53Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:25:53Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.issn0010-440X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90120-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/11757
dc.description13th Fall Conference of the International-Society-for-the-Study-of-Dissociation -- 35377 -- SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000078888500011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 10080263en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study attempted to determine the prevalence of dissociative identity disorder in the general population. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) was administered to 994 subjects in 500 homes who constituted a representative sample of the population of Sivas City, Turkey. The mean DES score was 6.7 +/- 6.1 (mean +/- SD). Of the 62 respondents who scored above 17 on the DES, 32 (51.6%) could be contacted during the second phase of the study, They were matched for age and gender with a group of respondents who scored below 10 on the scale, and the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS) was then administered to both groups. Seventeen subjects (1.7%) received a diagnosis of dissociative disorder according to the structured interview. In the third phase, eight of 17 subjects who had a dissociative disorder on the structured interview could be contacted for a clinical evaluation. They were matched with a nondissociative control group and interviewed by a clinician blind to the structured interview diagnosis. Four of eight subjects were diagnosed clinically with dissociative identity disorder, yielding a minimum prevalence of 0.4%. Dissociative identity disorder is not rare in the general population. Self-rating instruments and structured interviews can be used successfully for screening these cases. Our data, derived from a population with no public awareness about dissociative identity disorder and no exposure to systematic psycho-therapy, suggest that dissociative identity disorder cannot be considered simply an iatrogenic artifact, a culture-bound syndrome, or a phenomenon induced by media influences, Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunders Company.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInt Soc Study Dissociaten_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS COen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90120-7en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleFrequency of dissociative identity disorder in the general population in Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCOMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCumhuriyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Sivas, Turkey -- Univ Istanbul, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Dissociat Disorders Program, Istanbul, Turkey -- Univ Istanbul, Fac Med, Clin Psychotherapy Unit, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDSar, Vedat -- 0000-0002-5392-9644; Yargic, Ilhan -- 0000-0002-0326-4162en_US
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage159en_US
dc.identifier.startpage151en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record