Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHakan Akın
dc.contributor.authorFaik Tugut
dc.contributor.authorBurcu Mutaf
dc.contributor.authorÜmit Güney
dc.contributor.authorAli K. Özdemir
dc.date.accessioned23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T16:27:32Z
dc.date.available23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-23T16:27:32Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1302-5805
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TVRNeE5qQXlNZz09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/2093
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bonding properties of sandblasted with different size of aluminum oxide particles denture base to silicone based soft denture liner. Methods: Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) test specimens were fabricated and then randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15), according to the treatments applied, untreated (control, group 1), sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3 (group 2), 60 μm Al2O3 (group 3), 120 μm Al2O3 (group 4), and 250 μm Al2O3 (group 5). The resilient liner specimens were processed between 2 PMMA blocks. Bonding strength of the liners to PMMA was compared by tensile test with the use of universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The mean value and standard deviation of the specimens were statistically evaluated by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests (α=0.05). Results: The highest mean force value was observed in group 4 specimens, and the lowest mean force value was observed in group 2 specimens. The differences between groups 1 and 4 was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001). Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference in tensile bond strength between groups 1 (control) and groups 2, 3, and 5 specimens. Conclusions: Different particle sizes of aluminum oxide particles affect the bond strength of PMMA/resilient liner. Furthermore, 120 μm Al2O3 particles are the best particle size to improve strength of the bond.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bonding properties of sandblasted with different size of aluminum oxide particles denture base to silicone based soft denture liner. Methods: Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) test specimens were fabricated and then randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15), according to the treatments applied, untreated (control, group 1), sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3 (group 2), 60 μm Al2O3 (group 3), 120 μm Al2O3 (group 4), and 250 μm Al2O3 (group 5). The resilient liner specimens were processed between 2 PMMA blocks. Bonding strength of the liners to PMMA was compared by tensile test with the use of universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The mean value and standard deviation of the specimens were statistically evaluated by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests (α=0.05). Results: The highest mean force value was observed in group 4 specimens, and the lowest mean force value was observed in group 2 specimens. The differences between groups 1 and 4 was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001). Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference in tensile bond strength between groups 1 (control) and groups 2, 3, and 5 specimens. Conclusions: Different particle sizes of aluminum oxide particles affect the bond strength of PMMA/resilient liner. Furthermore, 120 μm Al2O3 particles are the best particle size to improve strength of the bond.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliğien_US
dc.titleEffect of sandblasting with different size of aluminum oxide particles on tensile bond strength of resilient liner to denture baseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record