Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVeli Batdı
dc.contributor.authorŞenel Elaldı
dc.date.accessioned23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T16:40:06Z
dc.date.available23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-23T16:40:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1303-0485
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TWpBME1qRTBOQT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/4003
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study is to analyze high school English curriculum materials (ECM) through FACETS analysis and MAXQDA-11 programs. The mixed methods approach, both quantitative and qualitative methods, were used in three samples including English teachers in Elazig during the 2014-2015 academic year. While the quantitative phase of the study involved the Rasch model and SPSS analysis, the qualitative phase included a case study research method. The quantitative data collection tool was the "High School English Curriculum Material Evaluation Form" developed by the researchers. Qualitative data were collected through an interview. According to the Rasch analysis results, while the material Headway coded as HEA has the highest quality, the materials coded A1.2 and A2.1 have the poorest quality. In terms of items, the most difficult item was G-M28 and for judges, J3 has the most severe while J13 has the most lenient behavior. The qualitative analysis indicated that among the themes, "deficiencies" had the most dominant dispersing of teacher comments while the theme "what to do" was not notable to every teacher. It is suggested that the balanced distribution of four language skills in ECM should be improved to achieve the objectives of the curriculum.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study is to analyze high school English curriculum materials (ECM) through FACETS analysis and MAXQDA-11 programs. The mixed methods approach, both quantitative and qualitative methods, were used in three samples including English teachers in Elazig during the 2014-2015 academic year. While the quantitative phase of the study involved the Rasch model and SPSS analysis, the qualitative phase included a case study research method. The quantitative data collection tool was the "High School English Curriculum Material Evaluation Form" developed by the researchers. Qualitative data were collected through an interview. According to the Rasch analysis results, while the material Headway coded as HEA has the highest quality, the materials coded A1.2 and A2.1 have the poorest quality. In terms of items, the most difficult item was G-M28 and for judges, J3 has the most severe while J13 has the most lenient behavior. The qualitative analysis indicated that among the themes, "deficiencies" had the most dominant dispersing of teacher comments while the theme "what to do" was not notable to every teacher. It is suggested that the balanced distribution of four language skills in ECM should be improved to achieve the objectives of the curriculum.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEğitimen_US
dc.subjectEğitim Araştırmalarıen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of High School English Curriculum Materials through Rasch Measurement Model and Maxqdaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalKuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimlerien_US
dc.contributor.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1347en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1325en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record