Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorİrfan Cicin
dc.contributor.authorTahsin Özatlı
dc.contributor.authorEsma Türkmen
dc.contributor.authorTürkan Özturk
dc.contributor.authorMelike Özçelik
dc.contributor.authorDevrim Çabuk
dc.contributor.authorAyşe Gökdurnalı
dc.contributor.authorÖzlem Balvan
dc.contributor.authorYaşar Yıldız
dc.contributor.authorMetin Şeker
dc.contributor.authorNuriye Özdemir
dc.contributor.authorBurcu Yapar
dc.contributor.authorÖzgür Tanrıverdi
dc.contributor.authorYusuf Günaydin
dc.contributor.authorSerkan Menekşe
dc.contributor.authorBerna Öksüzoğlu
dc.contributor.authorAsude Aksoy
dc.contributor.authorBülent Erdogan
dc.contributor.authorM Bekir Hacıoglu
dc.contributor.authorErkan Arpaci
dc.contributor.authorAlper Sevinç
dc.date.accessioned23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T16:41:48Z
dc.date.available23.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-23T16:41:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2146-3123
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TWpBME5UWXdNQT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/4231
dc.description.abstractBackground: Prognostic factors and the standard treatment approach for gynaecological carcinosarco-mas have not yet been clearly defined. Although car-cinosarcomas are more aggressive than pure epithelial tumours, they are treated similarly. Serous/clear cell and endometrioid components may be predictive fac-tors for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT) or RT in patients with uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas. Heterologous carcino-sarcomas may benefit more from adjuvant CT.Aims: We aimed to define the prognostic and predic-tive factors associated with treatment options in ovar-ian (OCS) and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional studyMethods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical re-cords of patients with ovarian and uterine carcinosar-coma from 2000 to 2013, and 127 women were includ-ed in this study (24 ovarian and 103 uterine). Patients admitted to seventeen oncology centres in Turkey be-tween 2000 and December 2013 with a histologically proven diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma with FIGO 2009 stage I-III and patients with sufficient data ob-tained from well-kept medical records were included in this study. Stage IV tumours were excluded. The pa-tient records were retrospectively reviewed. Data from 104 patients were evaluated for this study.Results: Age (>=70 years) was a poor prognostic factor for UCS (p=0.036). Pelvic±para aortic lymph node dis-section did not affect overall survival (OS) (p=0.35). Macroscopic residual disease was related with OS (p<0.01). The median OS was significantly longer in stage I-II patients than stage III patients (p=0.03). Adjuvant treatment improved OS (p=0.013). Adju-vant radiotherapy tended to increase the median OSen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Prognostic factors and the standard treatment approach for gynaecological carcinosarco-mas have not yet been clearly defined. Although car-cinosarcomas are more aggressive than pure epithelial tumours, they are treated similarly. Serous/clear cell and endometrioid components may be predictive fac-tors for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT) or RT in patients with uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas. Heterologous carcino-sarcomas may benefit more from adjuvant CT.Aims: We aimed to define the prognostic and predic-tive factors associated with treatment options in ovar-ian (OCS) and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional studyMethods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical re-cords of patients with ovarian and uterine carcinosar-coma from 2000 to 2013, and 127 women were includ-ed in this study (24 ovarian and 103 uterine). Patients admitted to seventeen oncology centres in Turkey be-tween 2000 and December 2013 with a histologically proven diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma with FIGO 2009 stage I-III and patients with sufficient data ob-tained from well-kept medical records were included in this study. Stage IV tumours were excluded. The pa-tient records were retrospectively reviewed. Data from 104 patients were evaluated for this study.Results: Age (>=70 years) was a poor prognostic factor for UCS (p=0.036). Pelvic±para aortic lymph node dis-section did not affect overall survival (OS) (p=0.35). Macroscopic residual disease was related with OS (p<0.01). The median OS was significantly longer in stage I-II patients than stage III patients (p=0.03). Adjuvant treatment improved OS (p=0.013). Adju-vant radiotherapy tended to increase the median OSen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCerrahien_US
dc.titlePredictive and Prognostic Factors in Ovarian and Uterine Carcinosarcomasen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalBalkan Medical Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.endpage524en_US
dc.identifier.startpage517en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record