Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaşibüyük H.H.
dc.contributor.authorÇiplak B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:13:32Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:13:32Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.issn1300-0179
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/4729
dc.description.abstractTaxonomy has always been a controversial field of biology because it is interlinked with other biological areas, and also requires a philosophy. Currently, four main schools are practising taxonomy. These are traditional taxonomy, phenetics, evolutionary taxonomy and cladistics. Each one has different approaches either in their philosophy or methodology. The task, here, is not to argue which one is superior or to recommend one for usage. Instead, we attempt to give a short introductory review on cladistics which has been widely practised in the last three decades.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCladisticen_US
dc.subjectSistematicen_US
dc.titlePhylogenetic systematic: A short introductory review on its terms, principles and thechniques [Filogenetik sistematik: Terimleri, prensipleri ve çalişma tekni?i üzerine kisa bir derleme]en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Zoologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBaşibüyük, H.H., Department of Biology, Emperial Collage, Natural History Museum, London, SW7, 5BD, United Kingdom, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Sivas, Turkey -- Çiplak, B., Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Antalya, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.endpage257en_US
dc.identifier.startpage241en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record