Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEr K.
dc.contributor.authorTasdemir T.
dc.contributor.authorSiso S.H.
dc.contributor.authorCelik D.
dc.contributor.authorCora S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:14:55Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:14:55Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/5007
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study was designed to evaluate the fracture resistance of retreated roots using different rotary retreatment systems. Methods: Forty eight freshly extracted human canine teeth with single straight root canals were instrumented sequentially increasing from size 30 to a size 55 using K-files whit a stepback technique. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental and one control groups of 12 specimens each. The root canals were filled using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer in experimental groups. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), R-Endo (Micro-Mega, Besançon, France), and Mtwo (Sweden & Martina, Padova, Italy) rotary retreatment systems. Control group specimens were only instrumented, not filled or retreated. The specimens were then mounted in copper rings, were filled with a self-curing polymethylmethacrylate resin, and the force required to cause vertical root fracture was measured using a universal testing device. The force of fracture of the roots was recorded and the results in the various groups were compared. Statistical analysis was accomplished by one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey tests. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the control and experimental groups (P<.05). However, there were no significant differences among the experimental groups. Conclusions: Based on the results, all rotary retreatment techniques used in this in vitro study produced similar root weakness.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEr, K.; Akdeniz Universitesi, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dali, Antalya, Turkey; email: kursater@akdeniz.edu.tren_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFracture resistanceen_US
dc.subjectRetreatmenten_US
dc.subjectRoot fractureen_US
dc.subjectRotary instrumentsen_US
dc.titleFracture resistance of retreated roots using different retreatment systemsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEr, K., Akdeniz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Antalya, Turkey -- Tasdemir, T., Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Trabzon, Turkey -- Siso, S.H., Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Sivas, Turkey -- Celik, D., Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Trabzon, Turkey -- Cora, S., Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Trabzon, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage392en_US
dc.identifier.startpage387en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record