Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÇetin B.
dc.contributor.authorArici M.K.
dc.contributor.authorÖzeç A.V.
dc.contributor.authorToker M.I.
dc.contributor.authorErdo?an H.
dc.contributor.authorTopalkara A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:15:01Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1300-0659
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.41.14633
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/5022
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In this study, we evaluated the optic performance of Zaraccom UF intraocular lens (IOL) by comparing the contrast sensitivity of IOLs in photopic and mesopic lighting conditions in patients who were operated for cataract and inserted Zaraccom Ultraflex (UF) or Zaraccom F260 (F260) IOL. Methods: In this prospective study, we included 60 eyes of 60 patients (Group 1: 30 patients UF, Group 2: 30 patients F260) who had undergone phacoemulsification with implantation of IOL in the posterior chamber between 2009 and 2010 in Ophthalmology Department at Cumhuriyet University. The patients were examined routinely at the 1. day, 1. week and 1. month postoperatively. At the third month, the best-corrected visual acuity values were recorded; then the contrast sensitivity tests at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cpd were examined in all patients in all frequencies in photopic (with and without glare) and mesopic (with and without glare) lighting conditions. Results: When comparing the contrast sensitivity results in the two groups, we found that UF group's values were higher in all spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cpd). The results were statistically significantly greater for the test frequencies of mesopic without glare 1.5 (p=0.016) and 18 (p=0.005) cpd, mesopic with glare 6 (p=0.002) cpd, photopic without glare 1.5 (p=0.01), 3 (p=0.04), 6 (p=0.001) and 12 (p=0.001) cpd, photopic with glare 6 (p=0.01) and 12 (p=0.02) cpd (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results show that both IOLs provide good level of contrast sensitivity, but better visual perception is achieved with UF IOL. We think that the High Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) value of the UF IOL is an important factor for the obtained results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipÖzeç, A. V.; Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkey; email: vural.ayse@gmail.comen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/tjo.41.14633en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCataracten_US
dc.subjectContrast sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectGlareen_US
dc.subjectMesopicen_US
dc.subjectPhacoemulsificationen_US
dc.subjectPhotopicen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of contrast sensitivity in patients with zaraccom ultraflex or F260 intraocular lens inserted [Zaraccom ultraflex veya F260 göz Iiçi lens takilan hastalarda Kontrast Duyarlili?in De?erlendirilmesi ve Karştirilmasi]en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurk Oftalmoloiji Dergisien_US
dc.contributor.departmentÇetin, B., Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkey -- Arici, M.K., Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkey -- Özeç, A.V., Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkey -- Toker, M.I., Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkey -- Erdo?an, H., Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkey -- Topalkara, A., Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Göz Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage235en_US
dc.identifier.startpage230en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record