Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTürk A.G.
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy M.
dc.contributor.authorYüce M.
dc.contributor.authorYüce M.
dc.contributor.authorAkin H.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:31:42Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:31:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140. 5000176521
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/5321
dc.descriptionCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different impression materials with evaluating the marginal fits of metal frameworks using replica technique. Materials and Methods: A phantom premolar tooth was prepared with a 1 mm circumferential chamfer preparation. Four impression materials: two vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) (Affinis Precious, (Group A); Elite HD, (Group E)), one polyether (Impregum Penta Soft, (Group P)) and one vinyl siloxanether (Identium, (Group I)) were used for producing stone casts of this master model. Twelve measurements per replica were carried out using a light microscope X40 magnification by Leica software, to assess the vertical marginal gap (VMG). Data were analyzed using the analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test (p=0.05). Results: Specimens of the Group A and Group I showed significantly lower VMG values than those of Group E and Group P (p<0.001). Differences were not significant between Group A and Group I, and Group E and Group P either (p>0.05). Conclusions: All impression materials were clinically acceptable. As well as composition of the impression materials, size of filler particles and fluid mechanics of flow into very small spaces can be effective on accuracy of the materials. © 2016, Cumhuriyet Dent J. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTürk, A.G.; Ege University, Faculty of Dentistry Department of ProsthodonticsTurkey; email: agturk@gmail.comen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7126/cdj.58140. 5000176521en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectImpression materialsen_US
dc.subjectMarginal fiten_US
dc.subjectReplica techniqueen_US
dc.titleEffect of different impression materials on the marginal fit of frameworks: An in-vitro studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTürk, A.G., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, Izmir, Turkey -- Ulusoy, M., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, Izmir, Turkey -- Yüce, M., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, Izmir, Turkey, Private practice, Izmir, Turkey -- Yüce, M., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, Izmir, Turkey, Private practice, Izmir, Turkey -- Akin, H., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage153en_US
dc.identifier.startpage145en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record