Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEren D.
dc.contributor.authorBektas O.O.
dc.contributor.authorSiso S.H.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:32:27Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:32:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2013.1787
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/5546
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of four different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of aged composite resin by employing the micro-shear test. Material and Methods: Forty-eight composite blocks were prepared. All samples were thermocycled for 1000 cycles between (5±2) and (55±2) °C with a dwell time of 30 s and a transfer time of 5 s. The samples were randomly divided into four groups and were subjected to the following treatments (n=12): Group 1 - phosphoric acid; Group 2 - diamond bur ; Group 3 - diamond bur+ phosphoric acid; Group 4 - Er:YAG Laser. After the aging procedure, fresh microhybrid resin composite was bonded to the treated surfaces with an etch and rinse adhesive resin. The repair bond strength of each sample was determined using a micro-shear bond strength test. All data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test. Results: There were no significant differences between all groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, each of the four surface treatment methods produced sufficient repair bond strength. A proper bonding must be created between the existing aged composite and the new one for successful repair.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEren, D.; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey; email: digdemisin@hotmail.comen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7126/cdj.2013.1787en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComposite resinen_US
dc.subjectEr:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectMicro-shearen_US
dc.subjectRepair bond strengthen_US
dc.titleCan Er: YAG laser be an alternative to conventional methods for repairing composite resins?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEren, D., Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentisty, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey -- Bektas, O.O., Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentisty, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey -- Siso, S.H., Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmi Alem University, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage132en_US
dc.identifier.startpage125en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record