Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGokcen, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorGokce, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorKordan, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorKirac, Emre
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Gokce
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, Emin Yener
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:37:24Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:37:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1895-4588
dc.identifier.issn2299-0054
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.77260
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/6056
dc.descriptionWOS: 000457117600015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30766636en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Antegrade placement of double J stents in laparoscopy is considered a challenging and time-consuming process due to limitations regarding stent flexibility. Aim: To describe the method we used to facilitate the antegrade placement of intracorporeal stents in laparoscopic upper urinary tract (LUUT) surgery and report its results. Material and methods: Data obtained from 42 consecutive patients who had stents placed antegradely in laparoscopic pyeloplasty or in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for middle-upper ureteral stones were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 30.1 +/- 18.6 (10 months-68 years) and 13 patients were in the paediatric age group. All patients in the paediatric age group underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Results: The mean operative time for the 42 total cases, of which 32 underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and 10 laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, was 126.9 +/- 33.5 (70-200) min and the intraoperative stent placement time was calculated as 2.61 +/- 0.8 (1.5-5) min. The patients, who had a mean hospitalization time of 2.8 +/- 0.9 (2-5) months, required no additional interventions and no complications were encountered intraoperatively. In the patient series that had a mean follow-up time of 17.4 +/- 11.3 (1-35), it was determined only in 1 patient that the distal tip of the stent had not been in the bladder. Conclusions: The described modified antegrade stent placement technique is a practical method that is safe for all LUUT cases in both paediatric and adult age groups and it has been shown to produce successful outcomes and to be time-saving.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5114/wiitm.2018.77260en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectstentingen_US
dc.subjectpyeloplastyen_US
dc.subjectpelviureteral anastomosesen_US
dc.subjectupper ureteral stonesen_US
dc.titleAntegrade stent placement in laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery. Is there an easy way?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalVIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUESen_US
dc.contributor.department[Gokcen, Kaan -- Gokce, Gokhan -- Kirac, Emre -- Gultekin, Emin Yener] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Urol, Sivas, Turkey -- [Kordan, Yakup] Koc Univ, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Dundar, Gokce] Cizre State Hosp, Dept Urol, Cizre, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage106en_US
dc.identifier.startpage102en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record