Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGunes, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorSokmen, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Hakki
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorKerkutluoglu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Fatma Betul
dc.contributor.authorSokmen, Gulizar
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:37:46Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:37:46Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X
dc.identifier.issn1648-9144
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina54040058
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/6172
dc.descriptionWOS: 000448335400009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30344289en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Prevalence of atrial fibrillation is higher in hemodialysis patients as compared to the general population. Atrial electromechanical delay is known as a significant predictor of atrial fibrillation. In this study, we aimed to reveal the relationship between atrial electromechanical delay and attacks of atrial fibrillation. Materials and methods: The study included 77 hemodialysis patients over 18 years of age giving written consent to participate in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the results of 24-h Holter Electrocardiogram (Holter ECG) as the ones having attacks of atrial fibrillation and the others without any attack of atrial fibrillation. Standard echocardiographic measurements were taken from all patients. Additionally, atrial conduction times were measured by tissue Doppler technique and atrial electromechanical delays were calculated. Results: Intra- and interatrial electromechanical delay were found as significantly lengthened in the group of patients with attacks of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001 respectively). The optimal cut-off time for interatrial electromechanical delay to predict atrial fibrillation was >21 ms with a specificity of 79.3% and a sensitivity of 73.7% (area under the curve 0.820; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.716-0.898). In the multivariate logistic regression model, interatrial electromechanical delay (odds ratio = 1.230; 95% CI, 1.104-1.370; p < 0.001) and hypertension (odds ratio = 4.525; 95% CI, 1.042-19.651; p = 0.044) were also associated with atrial fibrillation after adjustment for variables found to be statistically significant in univariate analysis and correlated with interatrial electromechanical delay. Conclusions: Interatrial electromechanical delay is independently related with the attacks of atrial fibrillation detected on Holter ECG records in hemodialysis patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/medicina54040058en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectatrial electromechanical delayen_US
dc.subjectatrial fibrillationen_US
dc.subjecthemodialysisen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Atrial Electromechanical Delay to Predict Atrial Fibrillation in Hemodialysis Patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMEDICINA-LITHUANIAen_US
dc.contributor.department[Gunes, Hakan -- Sokmen, Abdullah -- Kerkutluoglu, Murat -- Sokmen, Gulizar] Sutcu Imam Univ, Dept Cardiol, TR-46040 Kahramanmaras, Turkey -- [Kaya, Hakki] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Cardiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- [Gungor, Ozkan -- Guzel, Fatma Betul] Sutcu Imam Univ, Dept Nephrol, TR-46040 Kahramanmaras, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume54en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record