Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSubasi, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorKol, Iclal Ozdemir
dc.contributor.authorDuger, Cevdet
dc.contributor.authorKaygusuz, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorIsbir, Ahmet Cemil
dc.contributor.authorGursoy, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorMimaroglu, Caner
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:40:20Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:40:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1607-8322
dc.identifier.issn2220-5799
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/6662
dc.descriptionWOS: 000424423300009en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanyl in total intraveous anesthesia (TIVA) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations. Methodology: Forty, 18-60 years old, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients were included in the study. In Group D, TIVA was performed by 150 mu g/kg/min propofol and 0.5 mu g/kg/h dexmedetomidine infusions. In Group R patients, TIVA was performed with 150 mu g/kg/min propofol and 0.5 mu g/kg/min remifentanil infusions. Systolic blood pressure, heart rate, SpO(2), end tidal CO2 were recorded. All infusions were terminated at the end of surgery. Adequate spontaneous respiration, extubation, and response to verbal commands; and Aldrete score >= 9 times, postoperative pain scores and vital parameters in the postoperative period were recorded. Patient-controlled analgesia pump was used in all postoperative patients. Total analgesic consumption, patients' first analgesic needs were recorded. Results: Intraoperative Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate values remained significantly lower in remifentanyl group compared to those in dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.05). First postoperative analgesia time was shorter and hemodynamic parameters were significantly higher in this group (p < 0.05). Postoperative recovery of dexmedetomidine group remained more stable in terms of VAS values (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Remifentanil provides a potent intraoperative anesthesia compared with dexmedetomidine; however, dexmedetomidine may be considered in TIVA as an option for a stable postoperative recovery.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CAREen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDexmedetomidineen_US
dc.subjectRemifentanylen_US
dc.subjectTotal intravenous anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.titleDexmedetomidine and remifentanil as adjuncts to total intravenous anesthesia with propofolen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CAREen_US
dc.contributor.department[Subasi, Hatice] Numune State Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Sivas, Turkey -- [Kol, Iclal Ozdemir -- Duger, Cevdet -- Kaygusuz, Kenan -- Isbir, Ahmet Cemil -- Gursoy, Sinan -- Mimaroglu, Caner] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.endpage334en_US
dc.identifier.startpage328en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record