Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKockanat, A.
dc.contributor.authorUnal, M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:44:07Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1591-996X
dc.identifier.issn2035-648X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/6920
dc.descriptionWOS: 000424078900003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 28598179en_US
dc.description.abstractAim This research was aimed to investigate the in vivo and in vitro performance of traditional and novel methods in the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Materials and methods One hundred twenty primary molar teeth were assessed by two examiners both in vivo using ICDAS II, radiographic examination, DIAGNOdent pen, CarieScan PRO and SoproLife camera and in vitro using the mentioned diagnostic methods except radiographic examination. In addition, in vitro examinations were repeated 2 weeks later. After sectioning and evaluation under stereomicroscope, the lesion depth was determined with Downer's histological criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the ROC curve were calculated at D1 and D3 thresholds. The intra- and inter- examiners' reproducibility were analysed using Cohen's kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results Intra- and inter- examiner repeatability were high for all methods. While ICDAS and SoproLife camera showed the highest sensitivity value at D1 and D3 thresholds in vivo, radiographic examination showed the lowest sensitivity values. While ICDAS and SoproLife camera showed the highest sensitivity values at D3 threshold in vitro, CarieScan PRO showed the lowest sensitivity value. Conclusion The ICDAS II method could be sufficient alone in diagnosis of occlusal caries of primary teeth. However, SoproLife camera may be useful in monitoring caries lesions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherARIESDUE SRLen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCaries detectionen_US
dc.subjectICDAS IIen_US
dc.subjectPrimary molarsen_US
dc.subjectSoprolife cameraen_US
dc.titleIn vivo and in vitro comparison of ICDAS II, DIAGNOdent pen, CarieScan PRO and SoproLife camera for occlusal caries detection in primary molar teethen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Kockanat, A. -- Unal, M.] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage104en_US
dc.identifier.startpage99en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record