dc.contributor.author | Simsek, Sancar | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozec, Ilker | |
dc.contributor.author | Kurkcu, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Benlidayi, Emre | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-28T09:44:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-28T09:44:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0278-2391 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1531-5053 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.026 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7206 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000382240700013 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 27351696 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the healing of artificially created peri-implant circumferential bone defects using three bone-regeneration techniques. Materials and Methods: Rabbit tibias (24 rabbits), in which bone defects (9-mm diameter, 4-mm depth) were created and implant beds (3-mm diameter, 6-mm depth) were prepared in the middle of the created defects, were used as the experimental model. Dental implants (3.0 x 10 mm) were inserted, and the peri-implant bone defects were grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) plus saline solution, DFDBA plus platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), or DFDBA plus rifamycin. After 4 weeks, the animals were euthanized and the implants with surrounding bone were removed. Undecalcified histomorphometric examinations with toluidine blue staining were performed, and the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and percentage of new bone formation were evaluated. Results: The BIC was 50.94% +/- 24.39% in the DFDBA-plus-saline solution group, 60.07% +/- 4.91% in the DFDBA-plus-rifamycin group, and 73.43% +/- 3.86% in the DFDBA-plus-PRF group. The percentage of new bone formation at the defect area was 37.61% +/- 1.70% in the DFDBA-plus-saline solution group, 48.51% +/- 2.80% in the DFDBA-plus-rifamycin group, and 63.09% +/- 2.10% in the DFDBA-plus-PRF group. In terms of new bone formation and BIC, the DFDBA-plus-PRF and DFDBA-plus-rifamycin groups were significantly different from the DFDBA-plus-saline solution group. The difference between the DFDBA-plus-PRF and DFDBA-plus-rifamycin groups was also statistically significant. Conclusions: The addition of PRF or rifamycin to DFDBA had a significant positive effect on bone healing in peri-implant bone defects. The DFDBA-plus-PRF group showed the highest percentages of new bone formation and BIC. (C) 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific Research Project Fund of Cumhuriyet University [DIS-126] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund of Cumhuriyet University under project number DIS-126. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.026 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone Formation in Peri-Implant Defects Treated With Different Regeneration Techniques: An Experimental Study in a Rabbit Model | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | [Simsek, Sancar -- Ozec, Ilker] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- [Kurkcu, Mehmet -- Benlidayi, Emre] Cukurova Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Adana, Turkey | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 74 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1764 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1757 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |