Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Sancar
dc.contributor.authorOzec, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorKurkcu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBenlidayi, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:44:54Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7206
dc.descriptionWOS: 000382240700013en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27351696en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the healing of artificially created peri-implant circumferential bone defects using three bone-regeneration techniques. Materials and Methods: Rabbit tibias (24 rabbits), in which bone defects (9-mm diameter, 4-mm depth) were created and implant beds (3-mm diameter, 6-mm depth) were prepared in the middle of the created defects, were used as the experimental model. Dental implants (3.0 x 10 mm) were inserted, and the peri-implant bone defects were grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) plus saline solution, DFDBA plus platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), or DFDBA plus rifamycin. After 4 weeks, the animals were euthanized and the implants with surrounding bone were removed. Undecalcified histomorphometric examinations with toluidine blue staining were performed, and the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and percentage of new bone formation were evaluated. Results: The BIC was 50.94% +/- 24.39% in the DFDBA-plus-saline solution group, 60.07% +/- 4.91% in the DFDBA-plus-rifamycin group, and 73.43% +/- 3.86% in the DFDBA-plus-PRF group. The percentage of new bone formation at the defect area was 37.61% +/- 1.70% in the DFDBA-plus-saline solution group, 48.51% +/- 2.80% in the DFDBA-plus-rifamycin group, and 63.09% +/- 2.10% in the DFDBA-plus-PRF group. In terms of new bone formation and BIC, the DFDBA-plus-PRF and DFDBA-plus-rifamycin groups were significantly different from the DFDBA-plus-saline solution group. The difference between the DFDBA-plus-PRF and DFDBA-plus-rifamycin groups was also statistically significant. Conclusions: The addition of PRF or rifamycin to DFDBA had a significant positive effect on bone healing in peri-implant bone defects. The DFDBA-plus-PRF group showed the highest percentages of new bone formation and BIC. (C) 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeonsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Project Fund of Cumhuriyet University [DIS-126]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund of Cumhuriyet University under project number DIS-126.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.026en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleHistomorphometric Evaluation of Bone Formation in Peri-Implant Defects Treated With Different Regeneration Techniques: An Experimental Study in a Rabbit Modelen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Simsek, Sancar -- Ozec, Ilker] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- [Kurkcu, Mehmet -- Benlidayi, Emre] Cukurova Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Adana, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1764en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1757en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record