Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTugut, Faik
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Mehmet Emre
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Derya Ozdemir
dc.contributor.authorKirmali, Omer
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:45:18Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12296
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7301
dc.descriptionWOS: 000379930800006en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26375732en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The bond strength of soft denture liner to a recently introduced denture base resin after thermocycling has not been compared to traditional denture base materials. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of soft denture liners to two chemically different denture base resins, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA). Materials and Methods: A total of 48 PMMA and UDMA tensile test specimens were fabricated by attaching two different soft denture liners (Molloplast-B, Permaflex) according to the manufacturers' instructions and assigned to two groups. Half of the specimens for each group were stored in water for 1 week, and the other half were thermocycled (5000 cycles) between baths of 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. Specimens were mounted on a universal testing machine with a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests (alpha = 0.05). Results: The highest bond strength was measured in the specimens from the UDMA/Molloplast groups, and the lowest was seen in the PMMA/Permaflex group. No significant difference in bond strength was detected in PMMA/Permaflex groups after thermocycling (p = 0.082), whereas other groups exhibited significant differences after thermocycling (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values in both the PMMA and UDMA groups. Regardless of types of soft liners, PMMA specimens presented lower bond strength values than UDMA specimens, both before and after thermocycling.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELLen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/jopr.12296en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPMMAen_US
dc.subjectUDMAen_US
dc.subjectsoft denture lineren_US
dc.subjecttensile bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectthermocyclingen_US
dc.titleTensile Bond Strength between Soft Liners and Two Chemically Different Denture Base Materials: Effect of Thermocyclingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Tugut, Faik -- Coskun, Mehmet Emre -- Dogan, Derya Ozdemir -- Akin, Hakan] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- [Kirmali, Omer] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Antalya, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDKirmali, Omer -- 0000-0002-4313-344Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.endpage323en_US
dc.identifier.startpage319en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record