Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAltunbas, D.
dc.contributor.authorKustarci, A.
dc.contributor.authorArslan, D.
dc.contributor.authorEr, K.
dc.contributor.authorKocak, S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:56:12Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:56:12Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.151769
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7879
dc.descriptionWOS: 000351753800011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25772919en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Correct working length determination is an important step for successful endodontic therapy. Objective: The objective was to compare in vitro the accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) (DentaPort ZX [Morita Co., Tokyo, Japan], SIROEndo Pocket [Sirona Dental Systems, NY, USA], and Rootor [Meta Biomed, Cheongwon-gun, Korea]) in detecting the major foramen using the clearing technique. Materials and Methods: Forty-five human extracted single-rooted teeth with mature apices were used for the study and divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. All teeth were embedded in an alginate model, and the electronic measurements were taken following the manufacturers orientations. Then, the teeth were cleared and photographed under a stereomicroscope with a digital camera. The distance from the file tip to the major foramen was measured using image analysis software program. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Chi-square tests at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The mean distances from the file tip to the major foramen were 0.164 0.292, 0.162 0.234, 0.341 0.166 mm in the DentaPort ZX, SIROEndo Pocket, and Rootor groups, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference between SIROEndo Pocket and Rootor (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between DentaPort ZX and other EALs (P > 0.05). Conclusion: DentaPort ZX located the major foramen with 100% accuracy within the range of 0.5 mm. However, the accuracy of the SIROEndo Pocket and Rootor in locating the major foramen within 0.5 mm was 73.3% and 86.7%, respectively. All EALs showed an acceptable determination of the major foramen within the range of 0.5 mm.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/1119-3077.151769en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClearing techniqueen_US
dc.subjectelectronic apex locatoren_US
dc.subjectendodonticsen_US
dc.subjectmajor foramenen_US
dc.titleComparison of various current electronic apex locators to determine the working length using the clearing techniqueen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalNIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICEen_US
dc.contributor.department[Altunbas, D.] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Sivas, Turkey -- [Kustarci, A. -- Er, K.] Akdeniz Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey -- [Arslan, D.] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Kocak, S.] Bulent Ecevit Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Zonguldak, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDEr, Kursat -- 0000-0002-0667-4909en_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.endpage363en_US
dc.identifier.startpage359en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record