Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirmali, Omer
dc.contributor.authorBarutcugil, Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorHarorli, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKapdan, Alper
dc.contributor.authorEr, Kursat
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:56:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:56:17Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0161-0457
dc.identifier.issn1932-8745
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sca.21183
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7932
dc.descriptionWOS: 000352814100001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25488400en_US
dc.description.abstractDebonding at the composite-adhesive interface is a major problem for indirect composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite resin after various surface treatments (air-abrasion with Al2O3, phosphoric acid-etchig and different applications of NdYAG laser irradiations). Fifty composite disks were subjected to secondary curing to complete polymerization and randomly divided into five experimental groups (n=10) including Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, phosphoric acid-etched; Group 3, air-abrasion with Al2O3; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non-contact and Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact. They were then bonded to resin cement and shear BS was determined in a universal testing device at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the BS values. The highest BS value was observed in Group 4 and followed by Group 3. Tukey test showed that there was no statistical difference between Group1, 2 and 5. Furthermore, differences in BSs between Group 4 and the other groups except Group 3 were significant (p<0.05) and also there were significant differences in BSs between Group 3 to 1 and Group 3 to 2 (p<0.05). This study reveals that air-abrasion with Al2O3 and Nd:YAG laser irradiation with non-contact provided a significant increase in BS between indirect composite and resin cement. SCANNING 37:89-94, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEY-HINDAWIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/sca.21183en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectindirect composite resinen_US
dc.subjectNd:YAG laseren_US
dc.subjectSEMen_US
dc.subjectsurface treatmenten_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.titleResin Cement to Indirect Composite Resin Bonding: Effect of Various Surface Treatmentsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalSCANNINGen_US
dc.contributor.department[Kirmali, Omer] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey -- [Barutcugil, Cagatay -- Harorli, Osman] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Fac Dent, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey -- [Kapdan, Alper] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Fac Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- [Er, Kursat] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Dent, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDBarutcugil, Cagatay -- 0000-0002-5321-2299; Er, Kursat -- 0000-0002-0667-4909; Kirmali, Omer -- 0000-0002-4313-344X; harorli, osman tolga -- 0000-0001-6828-5063en_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage94en_US
dc.identifier.startpage89en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record