Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKapdan, Arife
dc.contributor.authorOztas, Nurhan
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:56:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:56:17Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.02.026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7933
dc.descriptionWOS: 000353010800007en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage and bond strength in primary tooth dentin after disinfection with chlorhexidine solution or gaseous ozone. Materials and methods: Sixty primary first and second molar teeth without caries were collected. Thirty of these teeth were ground to expose the dentin surface and divided into three groups (n = 10 for each group). After the application of materials, the teeth were restored with compomer restorations. Dentin sticks were obtained from these specimens and used for the microtensile bond strength test. The effect on the microleakage of the same materials of compomer restorations was then tested. class V cavities were prepared on the facial surfaces of the remaining 30 sound primary first and second molars to which the materials were applied and that were restored with compomer. The teeth were thermocycled, stained with basic fuchsine, sectioned for microleakage evaluation, and examined under a stereomicroscope. Kruskall-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: When the bond strength of the groups were compared, the difference between the ozone group and the control group was not significant (P > 0.05); however, the difference between the chlorhexidine group and either of the other two groups was significant (P < 0.05). The chlorhexidine group of teeth showed the lowest bond strength rates. When the occlusal and gingival microleakage rates among the groups were compared, the difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Ozone application may be an alternative antibacterial procedure because the bond strength increased after ozone application. Chlorhexidine decreased bonding significantly. There was no significant difference between the microleakage values. Copyright (C) 2013, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER TAIWANen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jds.2013.02.026en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.subjectchlorhexidineen_US
dc.subjectmicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectozoneen_US
dc.titleEffects of chlorhexidine and gaseous ozone on microleakage and on the bond strength of dentin bonding agents with compomer restoration on primary teethen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.contributor.department[Kapdan, Arife] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- [Oztas, Nurhan] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDKaptan, Arife -- 0000-0003-4371-7768en_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage54en_US
dc.identifier.startpage46en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record