Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaracan, Alper
dc.contributor.authorTurkvaten, Aysel
dc.contributor.authorKaracan, Keziban
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:57:15Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:57:15Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1047-9511
dc.identifier.issn1467-1107
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1047951113000656
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8257
dc.descriptionWOS: 000334883700016en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23694814en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and gender distribution of variations in the aortic arch branching pattern using 64-slice computed tomograhic angiography. Materials and methods: A total of 1000 patients with a normal left-sided aortic arch who underwent computed tomographic angiography for various reasons were analysed retrospectively for the frequency of variation of aortic arch branching; the variations were categorised into seven types. Results: Of the 1000 patients, 79.2% had a normal aortic arch branching pattern - type 1 - and 20.8% had variations. The frequency of type 2 variation - brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries arising from the aortic arch in a common trunk - was 14.1%, that of type 3 - left vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch - was 4.1%, that of type 4 - coexistence of type 2 and type 3 - was 1.2%, that of type 5 - aberrant right subclavian artery - was 0.6%, that of type 6 - coexistence of aberrant right subclavian artery and bicarotid trunk - was 0.7%, and that for type 7 - thyroidea ima artery arising from the aortic arch - was 0.1%. The incidences of the variations of aortic arch branching were similar among males and females (20% versus 22.1%). The incidence of an aberrant right subclavian artery - type 5 and type 6 - was higher among females compared with males (2.5% versus 0.5), whereas the frequencies of the other variations were either equal or similar in both genders. Conclusion: Recognition of variations of aortic arch branching is important because they may cause symptoms due to tracheoesophageal compression or complications during surgical or endovascular interventional procedures of the aorta and its branches.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1017/S1047951113000656en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAortic archen_US
dc.subjectanomalyen_US
dc.subjectmulti-detector computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectvariationen_US
dc.titleAnatomical variations of aortic arch branching: evaluation with computed tomographic angiographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNGen_US
dc.contributor.department[Karacan, Alper -- Turkvaten, Aysel] Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hosp, Dept Radiol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey -- [Karacan, Keziban] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.endpage493en_US
dc.identifier.startpage485en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record