Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBicakci, Ali Altug
dc.contributor.authorCankaya, Ozkan Semih
dc.contributor.authorMertoglu, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Nurbengu
dc.contributor.authorAltan, Burcu Kocoglu
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:58:37Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:58:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2319/021413-133.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8526
dc.descriptionWOS: 000327291300002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23678998en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine the effect of maxillary incisor proclination due to orthodontic treatment upon the sagittal position of point A and evaluate the effect of this possible movement of point A on sella-nasion-point A (SNA) angle. Materials and Methods: A study group was formed from 25 subjects (12 male and 13 female) who had Class II division 2 malocclusion with retroclined upper incisors, and a control group was formed from 25 subjects (12 male and 13 female) who had minor crowding in the beginning of the treatment and required no or minimal maxillary anterior tooth movement. Treatment changes in maxillary incisor inclination, sagittal position of point A, SNA angle, and movement of incisor root apex and incisal edge were calculated on pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalographs. Results: Maxillary incisors were significantly proclined (17.33 degrees) in the study group and not significantly proclined (1.81 degrees) in the control group. This proclination resulted in 2.12-mm backward movement of the root apex and 5.76-mm forward movempnt of the incisal edge of maxillary incisors. Point A moved 1.04 mm backward (P = .582) and 0.48 mm (P = .811) forward in the study and control groups, respectively. Incisor root apex and incisal edge almost remained stable in the control group. No significant change was observed in the value of the SNA angle in both the study and control groups. Conclusions: Proclination of maxillary incisors accompanied by backward movement of incisor root apex caused posterior movement of point A. However, this posterior movement does not significantly affect the SNA angle.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherE H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2319/021413-133.1en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectClass II division 2en_US
dc.subjectPoint Aen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary incisor proclinationen_US
dc.titleDoes proclination of maxillary incisors really affect the sagittal position of point A?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalANGLE ORTHODONTISTen_US
dc.contributor.department[Bicakci, Ali Altug] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-60000 Tokat, Turkey -- [Cankaya, Ozkan Semih -- Mertoglu, Serhat -- Yilmaz, Nurbengu] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Sivas, Turkey -- [Altan, Burcu Kocoglu] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Kocaeli, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.endpage947en_US
dc.identifier.startpage943en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record