Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKucukdurmaz, Zekeriya
dc.contributor.authorKato, Ritsushi
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Alim
dc.contributor.authorGolcuk, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorTobiume, Takeshi
dc.contributor.authorNagase, Takahiko
dc.contributor.authorIkeda, Yoshifumi
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Yoshie
dc.contributor.authorMatsumura, Makoto
dc.contributor.authorKomiyama, Nobuyuki
dc.contributor.authorNishimura, Shigeyuki
dc.contributor.authorMatsumoto, Kazuo
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:59:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1383-875X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9794-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8630
dc.descriptionWOS: 000321268700008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23625275en_US
dc.description.abstractIt is still unknown whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) might affect the magnitude of improvement after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation on cardiac function in persistent or longstanding persistent AF (CAF) patients. We performed echocardiography in 35 patients with CAF before and after catheter ablation (CA). Patients were stratified by LVEF into two groups prior to CA-normal LVEF (a parts per thousand yen50 % LVEF, N group, n = 24) and a low LVEF group (< 50 % LVEF, L group, n = 11). Patients were followed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ablation. After 15.8 +/- 7.4 months follow-up, the L group showed greater improvement in LVEF and left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF; N group vs L group: LVEF difference (%), 5 +/- 8 vs 20 +/- 13, p < 0.01; LAEF difference (%), 11 +/- 12 vs 21 +/- 10, p < 0.05). LA maximal volume and E/e' showed the same tendency after ablation, although the extent of improvement was not statistically significant. Both groups showed almost the same time course of improvement up to 2 years, although the L group showed earlier recovery in LVEF. The greater improvement in several cardiac functions was seen in patients with greater LV dysfunction, after the CA for CAF.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10840-013-9794-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillationen_US
dc.subjectCatheter ablationen_US
dc.subjectCardiac functionen_US
dc.subjectEchocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectLow LVEFen_US
dc.titleCatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation results in greater improvement in cardiac function in patients with low versus normal left ventricular ejection fractionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Kucukdurmaz, Zekeriya -- Erdem, Alim] Cumhuriyet Univ Med Sch, Dept Cardiol, Sivas, Turkey -- [Kucukdurmaz, Zekeriya -- Kato, Ritsushi -- Erdem, Alim -- Golcuk, Ebru -- Tobiume, Takeshi -- Nagase, Takahiko -- Ikeda, Yoshifumi -- Nakajima, Yoshie -- Matsumura, Makoto -- Komiyama, Nobuyuki -- Nishimura, Shigeyuki -- Matsumoto, Kazuo] Saitama Med Univ, Int Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Hidaka, Saitama 3501298, Japanen_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage187en_US
dc.identifier.startpage179en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record