Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkin, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ali Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:59:34Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:59:34Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.09.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8673
dc.descriptionWOS: 000322687800013en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: One of the problems that has limited magnets' wide acceptance by clinicians is their low corrosion resistance. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of corrosive environments and thermocycling on the attractive force of different types of new generation magnetic attachments. Materials and methods: We measured the attractive forces of 60 magnetic attachment systems (Hyper slim, Hicorex slim, Dyna, and Steco) with a universal test machine. We then immersed 40 of the magnetic attachment systems in two media, namely, 1% lactic acid solution (pH 2.3), and 0.9% NaCl solution (pH 7.3). The remaining magnetic attachments were put through 10,000 thermal cycles (5 degrees C/55 degrees C). We measured the attractive forces of the magnetic attachment systems again after immersion and thermocycling to compare data. The data were statistically evaluated with one-way analysis of variance, paired samples t-test, and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests (alpha = 0.05). Results: We found significant differences between the mean values before and after immersion in corrosive environments (P < 0.05). In contrast to the Dyna and Steco systems (P < 0.001), the differences between the attractive forces before and after thermocycling were not statistically significant for the Hicorex slim and Hyper slim systems (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Magnetic attachments showed lower attractive force after immersion in corrosive environments compared to their initial retentive force. In addition, closed-field systems were not affected by the thermocycling procedures and were more resistant than open-field systems to thermal variations characteristic of the oral cavity. Copyright (c) 2012, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCumhuriyet University Scientific Research Project (CUBAP)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis investigation was supported in part by Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Project (CUBAP). This study will be presented in a poster at the 10th International Congress of Academy of Prosthodontics and Gnathological Society, Antakya, Turkey, April 2012.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER TAIWANen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jds.2012.09.011en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectattractive forceen_US
dc.subjectcorrosionen_US
dc.subjectdental magnetsen_US
dc.subjectthermocyclingen_US
dc.titleEffect of corrosive environments and thermocycling on the attractive force of four types of dental magnetic attachmentsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.contributor.department[Akin, Hakan -- Ozdemir, Ali Kemal] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDAkin, Hakan -- 0000-0002-4770-4297en_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage188en_US
dc.identifier.startpage184en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record