Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBektas, Ozden Ozel
dc.contributor.authorEren, Digdem
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Gulsah Goktolga
dc.contributor.authorSag, Bilal Utku
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:59:52Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:59:52Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.741703
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8714
dc.descriptionWOS: 000322832200091en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23351224en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an at-home and two in-office (chemically activated and KTP laser-activated) bleaching methods on the microleakage of composite resin restorations bonded with etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems. Materials and methods. Class V cavity preparations were performed on 96 premolars and teeth were divided into two groups according to the two adhesive systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch). After cavities were restored with an adhesive systems and composite resin, they were submitted to thermocycling procedures. Teeth were divided into four sub-groups according to the bleaching systems (control, at-home bleaching, chemically activated office bleaching and KTP laser-activated office bleaching). After the bleaching procedure, teeth were evaluated for marginal leakage. All data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < 0.05). Results. The results of the present study showed that the control group presented lower microleakage values compared with the groups treated with bleaching agents, except for the chemically activated in-office bleaching. When the scores of microleakage at the enamel and gingival margins of the four groups were compared, the differences among the groups were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Comparing the gingival and enamel margins in each group, statistically significant differences were found in the at-home group (p < 0.05) and no significant differences were seen in the other groups (p > 0.05). No significant difference was found between the adhesive systems after treatment with the same bleaching techniques. Conclusion. Under the conditions of this study, microleakage of composite resin restorations differs according to the bleaching methods used and no difference was found between the adhesive systems.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3109/00016357.2012.741703en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectchemically activated bleachingen_US
dc.subjectKTP laser-activated bleachingen_US
dc.subjectat-home bleachingen_US
dc.subjectadhesive resinen_US
dc.titleMicroleakage effect on class V composite restorations with two adhesive systems using different bleaching methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.contributor.department[Bektas, Ozden Ozel -- Eren, Digdem -- Akin, Gulsah Goktolga -- Sag, Bilal Utku] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- [Ozcan, Mutlu] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland -- [Ozcan, Mutlu] Dent Mat Unit, Zurich, Switzerlanden_US
dc.identifier.volume71en_US
dc.identifier.issue03.Apren_US
dc.identifier.endpage1007en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1000en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record