Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkin, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorTugut, Faik
dc.contributor.authorTopcuoglu, Sedef
dc.contributor.authorKirmali, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:03:09Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:03:09Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28673
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/8889
dc.descriptionWOS: 000319167700009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23534016en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium (Ti) that was laser irradiated with different levels of energy and sandblasted. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 titanium rods (10 mm in length and 12 mm in diameter) were prepared. The rods were divided into three groups (n = 10) according to surface treatments: SB: sandblasted; L1: Nd: YAG laser irradiated at 100 mJ, 10 Hz, and 1 W; L2: Nd: YAG laser irradiated at 200 mJ, 10 Hz, and 2 W. After surface treatment, low-fusing porcelain was applied onto the titanium specimens according to the manufacturer's instructions, and these specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 C for 24 h. The shear bond strength test was performed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. In addition, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare the bond strength results (alpha = 0.05). SEM and EDS analysis were also performed for one specimen of each group after the shear bond strength test to evaluate the nature of the fracture surface. Results: Group L2 produced the highest shear bond strength among the groups. There was a statistically significant difference in shear bond strength between groups L1 and L2 (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, no significant difference was found between groups SB and L1. EDS analysis revealed that laser treatment reduced presence of oxygen on the surface of Ti. In contrast to the sandblasted specimens, laser-irradiated specimens showed predominantly adhesive failure. Conclusion: Laser treatment may be an alternative method to sandblasting for enhancing the bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3290/j.jad.a28673en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNd: YAGen_US
dc.subjectsandblastingen_US
dc.subjecttitaniumen_US
dc.subjectceramicen_US
dc.subjectshear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectlow-fusing porcelainen_US
dc.titleEffects of Sandblasting and Laser Irradiation on Shear Bond Strength of Low-fusing Porcelain to Titaniumen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Akin, Hakan -- Tugut, Faik -- Topcuoglu, Sedef -- Kirmali, Omer] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDm, sf001 -- 0000-0003-4662-6917; Kirmali, Omer -- 0000-0002-4313-344X; Akin, Hakan -- 0000-0002-4770-4297en_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage63en_US
dc.identifier.startpage55en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record