Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerez-Burgos, R.
dc.contributor.authorGrzelak, E. M.
dc.contributor.authorGokce, G.
dc.contributor.authorSaurina, J.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, J.
dc.contributor.authorBarron, D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:03:37Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:03:37Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1570-0232
dc.identifier.issn1873-376X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.05.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/9097
dc.descriptionWOS: 000306247300009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 22658467en_US
dc.description.abstractThis work was focused on the comparison of two clean-up methods to be used for the simultaneous determination of seven cephalosporins in cow muscle. In particular, the performance of novel dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) procedures based on QuEChERS methodologies was assessed and compared with conventional SPE. The separation and detection of the analytes using both methods was carried out by LC-MS/MS to reach enough sensitivity to be compatible with the detection of the maximum residue limits (MRL) of cephalosporins as regulated by EU directives. The optimization of the clean-up step relied on experimental design in order to find the most suitable conditions with a reduced number of assays. Besides, multi-objective responses were used to reach an overall compromise in the recovery of all analytes simultaneously. The validation of the two methods was done according to the Directive 2002/657/EC. Linearity, decision limit, detection capability, detection and quantification limits (4-50 mu kg(-1)), precision (RSD less than 15% except for PIR) and recoveries were determined and adequate results with comparable values using QuEChERS and SPE methodologies. LOQ were better for SPE method (0.1-10 mu g kg(-1)) but both methods show LOQ below MRL values. Precision was slightly better for the QuEChERS method, that also presents better recoveries, higher than 85% except for cephalexin. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [CTQ2010-19044/BQU]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (Project CTQ2010-19044/BQU).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.05.002en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCephalosporinsen_US
dc.subjectBeef tissuesen_US
dc.subjectQuEChERSen_US
dc.subjectSPEen_US
dc.subjectExperimental designen_US
dc.subjectLC-MS/MSen_US
dc.subjectValidation according 2002/657/ECen_US
dc.titleQuechers methodologies as an alternative to solid phase extraction (SPE) for the determination and characterization of residues of cephalosporins in beef muscle using LC-MS/MSen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCESen_US
dc.contributor.department[Perez-Burgos, R. -- Saurina, J. -- Barbosa, J. -- Barron, D.] Univ Barcelona, Dept Analyt Chem, Fac Chem, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain -- [Grzelak, E. M.] Marie Curie Sklodowska Univ, Dept Chromatog Methods, PL-20031 Lublin, Poland -- [Gokce, G.] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Elementary Sci Educ, Fac Educ, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDBarron, Dolores -- 0000-0002-2032-2838; Grzelak, Edyta M -- 0000-0002-3033-2917; Barbosa, Jose -- 0000-0002-0982-2049en_US
dc.identifier.volume899en_US
dc.identifier.endpage65en_US
dc.identifier.startpage57en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record