dc.contributor.author | Akin, Gulsah E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Herguner-Siso, Seyda | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozcan, Mutlu | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozel-Bektas, Ozden | |
dc.contributor.author | Akin, Hakan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-28T10:03:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-27T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-28T10:03:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1549-5418 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1557-8550 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2011.3170 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/9192 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000302776100005 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 22420776 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of one-step self-etch adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-irradiated and bur-cut dentin after water storage and thermocycling. Background data: The Er:YAG laser is a promising alternative method for cavity preparation; however, no study has compared the effect of laser irradiation and aging procedures on the adhesion of one-step self-etch adhesives to dentin. Methods: Seventy-two third molars were selected and randomly divided according to cavity preparation method (Er:YAG laser and bur-cut). One-step self-etch adhesive systems (Clearfil S-3 Bond, AdheSE One and Adper Easy One) were used to bond the composite to dentin. Following the adhesive procedure, the specimens were subdivided according to aging conditions (24 h in water control [C], 6 months of water storage [WS] and 10.000 thermocycles [TC]). The mu TBS was determined in a universal testing machine. Three-way ANOVA, independent samples t test, and post-hoc comparisons test (alpha = 0.05) were performed on all data. Results: There was no statistical difference in mu TBS between Er:YAG laser-irradiated and bur-cut dentin (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was found in mu TBS between C, WS, and TC specimens (p > 0.05). Moreover, Clearfil S-3 Bond presented the highest mu TBS to dentin in both laser-irradiated and bur-cut cavity preparation methods. Conclusions: Neither bur-cut nor Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin was affected by the aging methods used to simulate degradation of the adhesive interface. Er: YAG laser treatment may be used as an alternative cavity preparation method. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Cumhuriyet University | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This investigation was supported in part by the Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Project. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1089/pho.2011.3170 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Bond Strengths of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives to Laser-Irradiated and Bur-Cut Dentin After Water Storage and Thermocycling | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | [Akin, Gulsah E. -- Ozel-Bektas, Ozden] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- [Herguner-Siso, Seyda] Bezmialem Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Ozcan, Mutlu] Univ Zurich, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Dent Mat Unit, Zurich, Switzerland -- [Akin, Hakan] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | Akin, Hakan -- 0000-0002-4770-4297 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 221 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 214 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |