Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDemir, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Arife
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Orhan Murat
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Selda
dc.contributor.authorBolayir, Giray
dc.contributor.authorSoygun, Koray
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:04:47Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:04:47Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a21851
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/9395
dc.descriptionWOS: 000298334300009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 21734974en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study investigated the peel strength of two different soft liners to a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin before and after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: The silicone-based soft liner materials tested were Molloplast B and Permaflex; the denture base material was a heat-cured acrylic resin, Meliodent. A total of 40 specimens was prepared using rectangular molds with dimensions of 100 x 10 x 2 mm for PMMA and 150 x 10 x 2 mm for soft liners, as described in ASTM-D903-93. For each of the liner materials, 10 specimens were packed against a cured PMMA denture base surface as recommended by the manufacturers. The other 10 specimens were packed against PMMA denture base dough and processed together. In each group, 5 of the specimens were tested directly, while the other 5 were thermocycled in a water bath (5 C to 55 C; 3000 cycles) before testing. Peel testing was performed using an Instron testing machine. Results: The results revealed that peel strength values of the Permaflex specimens prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations were significantly higher than those of Molloplast B (p < 0.05). However, when packing was done against uncured PMMA dough, the difference between the specimens of two liners was not significant. Thermocycling led to significant decreases in the peel strength of both Permaflex liner specimens packed against cured/uncured PMMA resin surfaces (p < 0.05), whereas this process did not affect the strength of Molloplast B specimens. Conclusion: Results indicated that the material Molloplast B was superior to the material Permaflex in terms of peel strength when the specimens were simultaneously polymerized with PMMA and thermocycled.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3290/j.jad.a21851en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectpeel strengthen_US
dc.subjectPMMAen_US
dc.subjectsilicone soft linersen_US
dc.subjectthermocyclingen_US
dc.titlePeel Bond Strength of Two Silicone Soft Liners to a Heat-cured Denture Base Resinen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.department[Dogan, Arife] Gazi Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey -- [Demir, Hakan -- Dogan, Orhan Murat -- Bolayir, Giray -- Soygun, Koray] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Sivas, Turkey -- [Keskin, Selda] Middle E Tech Univ, Cent Lab, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.endpage584en_US
dc.identifier.startpage579en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record