Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ali
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Ismail Onder
dc.contributor.authorGuven, Ahmet Sami
dc.contributor.authorEngin, Aynur
dc.contributor.authorGulturk, Abdulaziz
dc.contributor.authorIcagasioglu, Fusun Dilara
dc.contributor.authorCevit, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:05:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:05:23Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1643-3750
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.881848
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/9506
dc.descriptionWOS: 000293140200008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 21709631en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Tularemia is a zoonotic infection, and the causative agent is Francisella tularensis. A first-line therapy for treating tularemia is aminoglycosides (streptomycin or, more commonly, gentamicin), and treatment duration is typically 7 to 10 days, with longer courses for more severe cases. Material/Methods: We evaluated 11 patients retrospectively. Failure of the therapy was defined by persistent or recurrent fever, increased size or appearance of new lymphadenopathies and persistence of the constitutional syndrome with elevation of the levels of the proteins associated with the acute phase of infection. Results: We observed fluctuating size of lymph nodes of 4 patients who were on the 7(th) day of empirical therapy. The therapy was switched to streptomycin alone and continued for 14 days. The other 7 patients, who had no complications, were on cefazolin and gentamycin therapy until the serologic diagnosis. Then we evaluated them again and observed that none of their lymph nodes regressed. We also switched their therapy to 14 days of streptomycin. After the 14 days on streptomycin therapy, we observed all the lymph nodes had recovered or regressed. During a follow-up 3 weeks later, we observed that all their lymph nodes had regressed to the clinically non-significant dimensions (< 1 cm). Conclusions: All patients were first treated with gentamicin, but were than given streptomycin after failure of gentamicin. This treatment was successful in all patients. The results of our study suggest that streptomycin is an effective choice of first-line treatment for pediatric oropharyngeal tularemia patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherINT SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, INCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.12659/MSM.881848en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectoropharyngeal tularemiaen_US
dc.subjecttreatment failureen_US
dc.subjectgentamicinen_US
dc.subjectstreptomycinen_US
dc.titleTreatment failure of gentamicin in pediatric patients with oropharyngeal tularemiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMEDICAL SCIENCE MONITORen_US
dc.contributor.department[Kaya, Ali -- Guven, Ahmet Sami -- Gulturk, Abdulaziz -- Icagasioglu, Fusun Dilara -- Cevit, Omer] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sivas, Turkey -- [Uysal, Ismail Onder] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Sivas, Turkey -- [Engin, Aynur] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.endpageCR380en_US
dc.identifier.startpageCR376en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record