Fracture Resistance of Root-Filled Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Current Dentin Bonding Adhesives

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridHurmuzlu, Feridun/0000-0003-2812-1835
dc.contributor.authorSiso, Seyda Herguner
dc.contributor.authorEr, Kursat
dc.contributor.authorHurmuzlu, Feridun
dc.contributor.authorKustarci, Alper
dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Kerem Engin
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:07:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:07:42Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim was to study and compare the fracture resistance of root-filled premolar teeth restored with various dentin bonding adhesives (DBAs). Material and Methods: Eighty extracted single-rooted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly assigned to eight groups (n=10). Group 1 (control) did not receive any preparation. From groups 2 to 8, the teeth were root filled and MOD cavities were prepared. Group 2 remained unrestored. Groups 3-8 were restored using the following DBAs: iBond (Heraeus Kulzer), G-Bond (GC Co.), Xeno III (Dentsply/Caulk), AdheSe (Ivoclar Vivadent), Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray); all preparations were further restored with a resin composite (Renew, Bisco). All specimens were then stored in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 24 h, followed by thermal cycling 500 times between 5 degrees and 55 degrees C. Compressive loading of the teeth was performed by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm min-1 until failure. The data were recorded in Newton (N) and were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test. Results: The mean loads necessary to fracture the samples in each group were: group 1: 984.00 +/- 116.27a, group 2: 167.30 +/- 47.26b, group 3: 872.30 +/- 164.99a, group 4: 848.70 +/- 157.84a, group 5: 916.30 +/- 246.19a, group 6: 863.20 +/- 197.69a, group 7: 802.20 +/- 183.84a, group 8: 870.70 +/- 126.48a. Similar letters indicate statistically similar values (P>0.05). Conclusion: The type of DBAs had no influence on the fracture resistance of teeth.
dc.identifier.endpage40
dc.identifier.issn0001-7019
dc.identifier.issn1846-0410
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage30
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/29648
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000447191500004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniv Zagreb, Sch Dental Medicine
dc.relation.ispartofActa Stomatologica Croatica
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBicuspid
dc.subjectTooth Fractures
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Materials
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents
dc.subjectComposite Resin
dc.titleFracture Resistance of Root-Filled Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Current Dentin Bonding Adhesives
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu