Evaluation of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis compliance: A multicenter point prevalence study
dc.contributor.author | Kıymaz, Yasemin Çakır | |
dc.contributor.author | Karakök, Taliha | |
dc.contributor.author | Büyükkörük, Merve | |
dc.contributor.author | Manavlı, Barış | |
dc.contributor.author | Baysal, Cihad | |
dc.contributor.author | Karaşın, Muhammed Fatih | |
dc.contributor.author | Işık, Merve Türker | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-04T16:42:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-04T16:42:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.department | Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: This study aimed to determine the frequency of compliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in Turkey and to identify the causes for noncompliance. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, point prevalence study was conducted in 8 hospitals from different regions of Turkey. Patients over 18 years who underwent SAP in all hospital surgical units were included. The SAP compliance assessment was carried out under 5 headings: unnecessary prophylaxis, inappropriate drug choice, prolonged prophylaxis, inappropriate dose interval, and inappropriate dosage. Results: The study included 541 patients from 8 centers. About 52.7% (n = 285) were female and the median age was 54 years (min-max: 18-94). Orthopedics (23.7%) and general surgery (22.2%) were the most common specialties. SAP compliance was 14%. The specialty with the highest rate of inappropriate SAP was orthopedics (97%) and the lowest rate was in ophthalmology (25%). The most common causes of inappropriate SAP were prolonged prophylaxis (92.0%) and inappropriate dose interval (84.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that prolonged surgical time, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score 3, and some specialties increased the risk of noncompliance with surgical prophylaxis. Conclusions: This study showed that SAP compliance is low in Turkey and that inappropriateness is caused mostly by prolonged and inappropriate antimicrobial use. © 2025 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ajic.2025.01.014 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 558 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-6553 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39855272 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85216893561 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 552 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.01.014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/35067 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 53 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Infection Control | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_Scopus_20250504 | |
dc.subject | Antibiotic resistance | |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial stewardship | |
dc.subject | Surgical prophylaxis | |
dc.title | Evaluation of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis compliance: A multicenter point prevalence study | |
dc.type | Article |