Comparison of Intraocular Pressure and PachymeterMeasurements Obtained by Non Contact Tonometerpachymeterwith Goldmann Applanation Tonometer andCorneal Topography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYeter, Duygu Yalınbas
dc.contributor.authorKoylu, Mehmet Talay
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Yeşim Gedık
dc.contributor.authorYesıltas, Yagmur Seda
dc.contributor.authorAkıncıoglu, Dorukcan
dc.contributor.authorGurdal, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Fatih Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T17:42:37Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T17:42:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) by tono-pachymeter (CT-1P) with\rIOP measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and CCT measurements by Pentacam.\rMaterials and Methods: Two hundred eighteen eyes of 109 patients were included in the study. Intraocular pressure measurements were\robtained by the CT-1P and GAT, whereas CCT measurements were obtained by CT-1P and Pentacam. Blant-Altman plots for agreement, and\rPearson correlation and interclass correlation (ICC) for reliability between the measurements were analyzed.\rResults: The mean IOPCT-1P, IOPCT-1P adj., IOPGAT were measured as 18.2±4.32 mmHg, 17.75±4.05 mmHg and 16.9±4.16 mmHg, respectively.\rThe mean CCT was measured as 554.8±37.3 ?m and 543.6±35.9 ?m with CT-1P and Pentacam, respectively. Mean differences between\rdevices were signifi cantly different in terms of IOP and CCT measurement (p<0.001, for all). Interclass correlation coeffi cient confi rmed the\rexcellent reliability between devices in terms of measurement of IOP and CCT (p<0.001, for all). The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for IOP\rwere -4.24 to 3.28 mmHg between IOPCT-1P adj. and IOPCT-1P, -3.49 to 5.14 mmHg between IOPCT-1P adj. and IOPGAT and -2.7 to 5.3 mmHg between\rIOPCT-1P and IOPGAT. Also 95% LoA for CCT were -12.33 to 32.16 ?m between CCTCT-1P and CCTPentacam.\rConclusion: Although CT-1P overestimated both IOP and CCT measurements, the device had an excellent ICC with Pentacam and GAT in\rterms of CCT and IOP measurements. The ability of tono-pachymeters measuring both CCT and IOP with a single device provide an important\rconvenience in busy clinics.
dc.identifier.doi10.37844/glauc.cat.2021.16.3
dc.identifier.endpage17
dc.identifier.issn1305-9173
dc.identifier.issn2717-7157
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage12
dc.identifier.trdizinid510894
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.37844/glauc.cat.2021.16.3
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/510894
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/24706
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofGlokom Katarakt
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleComparison of Intraocular Pressure and PachymeterMeasurements Obtained by Non Contact Tonometerpachymeterwith Goldmann Applanation Tonometer andCorneal Topography
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu