The practical value of technetium-99m-MIBI SPET to differentiate between ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure presenting with exertional dyspnea

Küçük Resim Yok

Tarih

2016

Yazarlar

Beton, Osman
Kurmus, Ozge
Asarcikli, Lale Dinc
Alibazoglu, Buket
Alibazoglu, Haluk
Yilmaz, Mehmet Birhan

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

HELLENIC SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

Objective: We aimed to differentiate ischemic heart failure (HF) from non-ischemic HF in patients presenting with non-acute onset exertional dyspnea using technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile gated single photon emission tomography (Tc-99m-MIBI gSPET) imaging. Subjects and Methods: One hundred and seventy nine consecutive patients with exertional dyspnea without concomitant chest pain referred to Tc-99m-MIBI gSPET imaging were included in this study. All patients had a newly diagnosed HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Imaging findings were compared between ischemic HF and non-ischemic HF groups. Results: Of the 179 patients, 127 had ischemic HF and 52 had non-ischemic HF. There was no difference between ischemic and non-ischemic groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index, any smoking history, diabetes mellitus, history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Global dysfunction of left ventricle was more common in non-ischemic HF group than ischemic HF group (82.7% vs 41.7% respectively, P<0.001). Presence of severe (3+/4+) ischemia and large perfusion defect were higher in ischemic HF group compared to non-ischemic HF group (45.7% vs 15.4%, P<0.001 and 23.6% vs 3.8%, P=0.003, respectively). Summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score and summed difference score were higher in ischemic HF group compared to non-ischemic HF group (P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.021, respectively). In multivariate analysis, absence of global dysfunction (P<0.001, OR=10.338, 95% CI: 3.937-27.405) and SSS (P<0.001, OR=1.208, 95% CI: 1.090-1.339) were the independent predictors of ischemic HF. Absence of global dysfunction had 58.3% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for diagnosis of ischemic HF at gSPET imaging in patients presenting with newly diagnosed HF and exertional dyspnea without concomitant chest pain (AUC=0.705, 95% CI: 0.632-0.771, P<0.001), whereas SSS>8 had 65.4% sensitivity and 75.0% specificity (AUC=0.732, 95% CI: 0.661-0.795, P<0.001). Conclusion: Absence of global dysfunction and SSS on SPET imaging were the independent predictors of ischemic etiology of HF presenting with dyspnea without concomitant chest pain. These findings had a low sensitivity, but acceptable specificity.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Single photon emission tomography, Newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, Exertional dyspnea without chest pain, Ishemic Non-ischemic

Kaynak

HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE

WoS Q Değeri

Q4

Scopus Q Değeri

Q3

Cilt

19

Sayı

2

Künye